Comparison of the CAMI-NSTEMI and GRACE Risk Model for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Chinese Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Introduction. The ability of risk models to predict in-hospital mortality and the influence on downstream therapeutic strategy has not been fully investigated in Chinese Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. Thus, we sought to validate and compare the performance of the G...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peng Wang, Hongliang Cong, Ying Zhang, Yujie Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Cardiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2469281
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832568545351827456
author Peng Wang
Hongliang Cong
Ying Zhang
Yujie Liu
author_facet Peng Wang
Hongliang Cong
Ying Zhang
Yujie Liu
author_sort Peng Wang
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. The ability of risk models to predict in-hospital mortality and the influence on downstream therapeutic strategy has not been fully investigated in Chinese Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. Thus, we sought to validate and compare the performance of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk model (GRM) and China Acute Myocardial Infarction risk model (CRM) and investigate impacts of the two models on the selection of downstream therapeutic strategies among these patients. Methods. We identified 2587 consecutive patients with NSTEMI. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death. For each patient, the predicted mortality was calculated according to GRM and CRM, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Hosmer–Lemeshow (H–L) test, and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used to assess the performance of models. Results. In-hospital death occurred in 4.89% (126/2587) patients. Compared to GRM, CRM demonstrated a larger AUC (0.809 versus 0.752, p<0.0001), less discrepancy between observed and predicted mortality (H–L χ2: 22.71 for GRM, p=0.0038 and 10.25 for CRM, p=0.2479), and positive NRI (0.3311, p<0.0001), resulting in a significant change of downstream therapeutic strategy. Conclusion. In Chinese NSTEMI patients, the CRM provided a more accurate estimation for in-hospital mortality, and application of the CRM instead of the GRM changes the downstream therapeutic strategy remarkably.
format Article
id doaj-art-0a3a98b0cbf94e9f86edccd864272783
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8016
2090-0597
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cardiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-0a3a98b0cbf94e9f86edccd8642727832025-02-03T00:58:43ZengWileyCardiology Research and Practice2090-80162090-05972020-01-01202010.1155/2020/24692812469281Comparison of the CAMI-NSTEMI and GRACE Risk Model for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Chinese Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction PatientsPeng Wang0Hongliang Cong1Ying Zhang2Yujie Liu3Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, ChinaTianjin Medical University, Tianjin, ChinaTianjin Medical University, Tianjin, ChinaTianjin Medical University, Tianjin, ChinaIntroduction. The ability of risk models to predict in-hospital mortality and the influence on downstream therapeutic strategy has not been fully investigated in Chinese Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. Thus, we sought to validate and compare the performance of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk model (GRM) and China Acute Myocardial Infarction risk model (CRM) and investigate impacts of the two models on the selection of downstream therapeutic strategies among these patients. Methods. We identified 2587 consecutive patients with NSTEMI. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death. For each patient, the predicted mortality was calculated according to GRM and CRM, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Hosmer–Lemeshow (H–L) test, and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used to assess the performance of models. Results. In-hospital death occurred in 4.89% (126/2587) patients. Compared to GRM, CRM demonstrated a larger AUC (0.809 versus 0.752, p<0.0001), less discrepancy between observed and predicted mortality (H–L χ2: 22.71 for GRM, p=0.0038 and 10.25 for CRM, p=0.2479), and positive NRI (0.3311, p<0.0001), resulting in a significant change of downstream therapeutic strategy. Conclusion. In Chinese NSTEMI patients, the CRM provided a more accurate estimation for in-hospital mortality, and application of the CRM instead of the GRM changes the downstream therapeutic strategy remarkably.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2469281
spellingShingle Peng Wang
Hongliang Cong
Ying Zhang
Yujie Liu
Comparison of the CAMI-NSTEMI and GRACE Risk Model for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Chinese Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients
Cardiology Research and Practice
title Comparison of the CAMI-NSTEMI and GRACE Risk Model for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Chinese Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients
title_full Comparison of the CAMI-NSTEMI and GRACE Risk Model for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Chinese Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of the CAMI-NSTEMI and GRACE Risk Model for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Chinese Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the CAMI-NSTEMI and GRACE Risk Model for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Chinese Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients
title_short Comparison of the CAMI-NSTEMI and GRACE Risk Model for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Chinese Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients
title_sort comparison of the cami nstemi and grace risk model for predicting in hospital mortality in chinese non st segment elevation myocardial infarction patients
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2469281
work_keys_str_mv AT pengwang comparisonofthecaminstemiandgraceriskmodelforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinchinesenonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatients
AT hongliangcong comparisonofthecaminstemiandgraceriskmodelforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinchinesenonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatients
AT yingzhang comparisonofthecaminstemiandgraceriskmodelforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinchinesenonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatients
AT yujieliu comparisonofthecaminstemiandgraceriskmodelforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinchinesenonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatients