Latarjet procedure versus iliac crest autograft transfer for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

Abstract Background Anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss presents a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The Latarjet and iliac crest bone graft transfer (ICBGT) procedures are commonly employed for its management, but direct comparative evidence is insufficient. Methods Following PRISMA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lang Li, Bofang Zeng, Meng Ding, Sha Wan, Kefu Lin, Zhen Tian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05425-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571423202213888
author Lang Li
Bofang Zeng
Meng Ding
Sha Wan
Kefu Lin
Zhen Tian
author_facet Lang Li
Bofang Zeng
Meng Ding
Sha Wan
Kefu Lin
Zhen Tian
author_sort Lang Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss presents a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The Latarjet and iliac crest bone graft transfer (ICBGT) procedures are commonly employed for its management, but direct comparative evidence is insufficient. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies directly comparing the Latarjet and ICBGT procedures were included. Primary outcomes included postoperative recurrent instability, apprehension test, and complications, while secondary outcomes comprised Rowe score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), pain level assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), and radiologic outcomes. Quality assessment was performed using RoB2 and MINORS tools. The weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous variables were calculated, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. Results A total of 6 studies with 409 patients were included. There was no significant difference in postoperative recurrent instability (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.44 to 4.03; P = 0.61), positive apprehension test (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.20 to 3.10; P = 0.73), revision surgery (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.74 to 5.71; P = 0.16), mild complications (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.06; 0.07), SSV (WMD, -1.94; 95% CI, -3.94 to 0.06; P = 0.06) or VAS score (WMD, 0.15; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.47; P = 0.36) between the two procedures. The ICBGT group exhibited statistically superior Rowe scores (WMD, -3.10; 95% CI, -5.10 to -1.10; P = 0.002), as well as improved external (WMD, -5.32; 95% CI, -7.30 to -3.30; P < 0.001) and internal rotation (WMD, -5.11; 95% CI, -6.76 to -3.45; P < 0.001). However, these differences did not surpass the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Radiological evaluations showed that the ICBGT procedure had statistically better outcomes in immediate glenoid augmentation, preservation and reduced fatty degeneration of the subscapularis (SSC) tendon, and graft remodeling at short-term follow-up. Conclusions The ICBGT procedure showed statistically superior Rowe scores and range of motion, but these differences may not be clinically significant. Both procedures had comparable outcomes in recurrent instability, apprehension test results, revision surgery, mild complications, SSV, and pain levels. ICBGT appears to offer advantages in glenoid augmentation and SSC preservation at short-term follow-up. PROSPERO registration ID CRD42024586157.
format Article
id doaj-art-0a1ce34203f94a699370b9948fcac6f1
institution Kabale University
issn 1749-799X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj-art-0a1ce34203f94a699370b9948fcac6f12025-02-02T12:34:05ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2025-01-0120111410.1186/s13018-024-05425-0Latarjet procedure versus iliac crest autograft transfer for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studiesLang Li0Bofang Zeng1Meng Ding2Sha Wan3Kefu Lin4Zhen Tian5Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People’s Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region (Hospital.C.T.)Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People’s Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region (Hospital.C.T.)Department of Rehabilitation, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People’s Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region (Hospital.C.T.)Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People’s Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region (Hospital.C.T.)Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People’s Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region (Hospital.C.T.)Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People’s Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region (Hospital.C.T.)Abstract Background Anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss presents a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The Latarjet and iliac crest bone graft transfer (ICBGT) procedures are commonly employed for its management, but direct comparative evidence is insufficient. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies directly comparing the Latarjet and ICBGT procedures were included. Primary outcomes included postoperative recurrent instability, apprehension test, and complications, while secondary outcomes comprised Rowe score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), pain level assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), and radiologic outcomes. Quality assessment was performed using RoB2 and MINORS tools. The weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous variables were calculated, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. Results A total of 6 studies with 409 patients were included. There was no significant difference in postoperative recurrent instability (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.44 to 4.03; P = 0.61), positive apprehension test (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.20 to 3.10; P = 0.73), revision surgery (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.74 to 5.71; P = 0.16), mild complications (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.06; 0.07), SSV (WMD, -1.94; 95% CI, -3.94 to 0.06; P = 0.06) or VAS score (WMD, 0.15; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.47; P = 0.36) between the two procedures. The ICBGT group exhibited statistically superior Rowe scores (WMD, -3.10; 95% CI, -5.10 to -1.10; P = 0.002), as well as improved external (WMD, -5.32; 95% CI, -7.30 to -3.30; P < 0.001) and internal rotation (WMD, -5.11; 95% CI, -6.76 to -3.45; P < 0.001). However, these differences did not surpass the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Radiological evaluations showed that the ICBGT procedure had statistically better outcomes in immediate glenoid augmentation, preservation and reduced fatty degeneration of the subscapularis (SSC) tendon, and graft remodeling at short-term follow-up. Conclusions The ICBGT procedure showed statistically superior Rowe scores and range of motion, but these differences may not be clinically significant. Both procedures had comparable outcomes in recurrent instability, apprehension test results, revision surgery, mild complications, SSV, and pain levels. ICBGT appears to offer advantages in glenoid augmentation and SSC preservation at short-term follow-up. PROSPERO registration ID CRD42024586157.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05425-0Anterior shoulder instabilityGlenoid bone lossLatarjet procedureIliac crest bone graft transferSystematic reviewMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Lang Li
Bofang Zeng
Meng Ding
Sha Wan
Kefu Lin
Zhen Tian
Latarjet procedure versus iliac crest autograft transfer for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Anterior shoulder instability
Glenoid bone loss
Latarjet procedure
Iliac crest bone graft transfer
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
title Latarjet procedure versus iliac crest autograft transfer for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
title_full Latarjet procedure versus iliac crest autograft transfer for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
title_fullStr Latarjet procedure versus iliac crest autograft transfer for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
title_full_unstemmed Latarjet procedure versus iliac crest autograft transfer for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
title_short Latarjet procedure versus iliac crest autograft transfer for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
title_sort latarjet procedure versus iliac crest autograft transfer for anterior shoulder instability a systematic review and meta analysis of comparative studies
topic Anterior shoulder instability
Glenoid bone loss
Latarjet procedure
Iliac crest bone graft transfer
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05425-0
work_keys_str_mv AT langli latarjetprocedureversusiliaccrestautografttransferforanteriorshoulderinstabilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT bofangzeng latarjetprocedureversusiliaccrestautografttransferforanteriorshoulderinstabilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT mengding latarjetprocedureversusiliaccrestautografttransferforanteriorshoulderinstabilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT shawan latarjetprocedureversusiliaccrestautografttransferforanteriorshoulderinstabilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT kefulin latarjetprocedureversusiliaccrestautografttransferforanteriorshoulderinstabilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT zhentian latarjetprocedureversusiliaccrestautografttransferforanteriorshoulderinstabilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies