Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block
Aim. Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are clinical situations that are characterized by pain, sound, and irregular movements of the temporomandibular joints. The most common method in the treatment of TMDs is arthrocentesis. This study aims to compare the effect of conventional extraoral auriculot...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Pain Research and Management |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4206275 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832554746300334080 |
|---|---|
| author | Onur Atalı Elif Özçelik Onur Gönül Hasan Garip |
| author_facet | Onur Atalı Elif Özçelik Onur Gönül Hasan Garip |
| author_sort | Onur Atalı |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim. Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are clinical situations that are characterized by pain, sound, and irregular movements of the temporomandibular joints. The most common method in the treatment of TMDs is arthrocentesis. This study aims to compare the effect of conventional extraoral auriculotemporal nerve block (ANB) and Gow-Gates (GG) mandibular anesthesia techniques on patient comfort in an arthrocentesis procedure. Materials and Methods. We performed this study on 40 patients who underwent TMJ arthrocentesis with ANB (n = 20) or GG (n = 20) mandibular anesthesia techniques at the Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry between 2016 and 2019. The predictor variable was the type of an anesthesia technique, and the outcome variables included were pain, maximum mouth opening (MMO), and protrusive movement (PM). They were compared at the preoperative period and 3rd and 6th month periods. Statistical analysis included means with standard deviations, a one-way ANOVA for continuous data, and the results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0.05. Results. No statistically significant difference was observed between the VAS values, MMO, and PM averages of preoperative, 3rd and 6th months of ANB and GG (p=0.142, p=0.209, and p=0.148). Conclusion. Both anesthesia techniques have provided effective results in terms of pain and functional jaw movements in the postoperative period in arthrocentesis treatment. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-098624d0f36d4a4db45d6300dff3d6b1 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1918-1523 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Pain Research and Management |
| spelling | doaj-art-098624d0f36d4a4db45d6300dff3d6b12025-02-03T05:50:38ZengWileyPain Research and Management1918-15232022-01-01202210.1155/2022/4206275Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve BlockOnur Atalı0Elif Özçelik1Onur Gönül2Hasan Garip3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryPrivate PracticeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAim. Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are clinical situations that are characterized by pain, sound, and irregular movements of the temporomandibular joints. The most common method in the treatment of TMDs is arthrocentesis. This study aims to compare the effect of conventional extraoral auriculotemporal nerve block (ANB) and Gow-Gates (GG) mandibular anesthesia techniques on patient comfort in an arthrocentesis procedure. Materials and Methods. We performed this study on 40 patients who underwent TMJ arthrocentesis with ANB (n = 20) or GG (n = 20) mandibular anesthesia techniques at the Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry between 2016 and 2019. The predictor variable was the type of an anesthesia technique, and the outcome variables included were pain, maximum mouth opening (MMO), and protrusive movement (PM). They were compared at the preoperative period and 3rd and 6th month periods. Statistical analysis included means with standard deviations, a one-way ANOVA for continuous data, and the results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0.05. Results. No statistically significant difference was observed between the VAS values, MMO, and PM averages of preoperative, 3rd and 6th months of ANB and GG (p=0.142, p=0.209, and p=0.148). Conclusion. Both anesthesia techniques have provided effective results in terms of pain and functional jaw movements in the postoperative period in arthrocentesis treatment.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4206275 |
| spellingShingle | Onur Atalı Elif Özçelik Onur Gönül Hasan Garip Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block Pain Research and Management |
| title | Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block |
| title_full | Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block |
| title_short | Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block |
| title_sort | evaluation of patient comfort and impact of different anesthesia techniques on the temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis applications by comparing gow gates mandibular block anesthesia with auriculotemporal nerve block |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4206275 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT onuratalı evaluationofpatientcomfortandimpactofdifferentanesthesiatechniquesonthetemporomandibularjointarthrocentesisapplicationsbycomparinggowgatesmandibularblockanesthesiawithauriculotemporalnerveblock AT elifozcelik evaluationofpatientcomfortandimpactofdifferentanesthesiatechniquesonthetemporomandibularjointarthrocentesisapplicationsbycomparinggowgatesmandibularblockanesthesiawithauriculotemporalnerveblock AT onurgonul evaluationofpatientcomfortandimpactofdifferentanesthesiatechniquesonthetemporomandibularjointarthrocentesisapplicationsbycomparinggowgatesmandibularblockanesthesiawithauriculotemporalnerveblock AT hasangarip evaluationofpatientcomfortandimpactofdifferentanesthesiatechniquesonthetemporomandibularjointarthrocentesisapplicationsbycomparinggowgatesmandibularblockanesthesiawithauriculotemporalnerveblock |