Referential Choices and Specific Language Impairment: Sensitivity to Contrast Levels and Grammatical Role
Speakers’ referential choices differ in the degree of explicitness, ranging from very explicit expressions (such as lexical NPs, e.g., the boy) to less explicit expressions (such as pronouns, e.g., he, and null elements). We examine the referential choices of children with Specific Language Impairme...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses universitaires de Caen
2016-09-01
|
| Series: | Discours |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/discours/9179 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832581836692258816 |
|---|---|
| author | Maja Stegenwallner-Schütz Flavia Adani |
| author_facet | Maja Stegenwallner-Schütz Flavia Adani |
| author_sort | Maja Stegenwallner-Schütz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Speakers’ referential choices differ in the degree of explicitness, ranging from very explicit expressions (such as lexical NPs, e.g., the boy) to less explicit expressions (such as pronouns, e.g., he, and null elements). We examine the referential choices of children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI), in order to differentiate between the linguistic and pragmatic abilities involved in the selection of appropriate referring expressions. Existing findings on referential choices by children with SLI are currently inconsistent and have mainly been reported based on narratives. We used an elicited production task to manipulate the referent’s accessibility by means of two factors: (a) contexts that instantiate different levels of contrast (one vs. two contrasts) and (b) the grammatical role of the expression (subject vs. object). We show that children with SLI and typically developing controls produce more explicit expressions for increased contrast levels and for objects than for subjects. Although children with SLI modify the explicitness of their referring expressions according to the accessibility of referents as typically developing children do, we also find varying production rates between the groups. We discuss how these differences in production rates surface as a consequence of language impairment, although the explicitness of referential choices remains otherwise largely unaffected. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-09754c9262c04061a60388c40f728b85 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1963-1723 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-09-01 |
| publisher | Presses universitaires de Caen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Discours |
| spelling | doaj-art-09754c9262c04061a60388c40f728b852025-01-30T09:52:57ZengPresses universitaires de CaenDiscours1963-17232016-09-011810.4000/discours.9179Referential Choices and Specific Language Impairment: Sensitivity to Contrast Levels and Grammatical RoleMaja Stegenwallner-SchützFlavia AdaniSpeakers’ referential choices differ in the degree of explicitness, ranging from very explicit expressions (such as lexical NPs, e.g., the boy) to less explicit expressions (such as pronouns, e.g., he, and null elements). We examine the referential choices of children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI), in order to differentiate between the linguistic and pragmatic abilities involved in the selection of appropriate referring expressions. Existing findings on referential choices by children with SLI are currently inconsistent and have mainly been reported based on narratives. We used an elicited production task to manipulate the referent’s accessibility by means of two factors: (a) contexts that instantiate different levels of contrast (one vs. two contrasts) and (b) the grammatical role of the expression (subject vs. object). We show that children with SLI and typically developing controls produce more explicit expressions for increased contrast levels and for objects than for subjects. Although children with SLI modify the explicitness of their referring expressions according to the accessibility of referents as typically developing children do, we also find varying production rates between the groups. We discuss how these differences in production rates surface as a consequence of language impairment, although the explicitness of referential choices remains otherwise largely unaffected.https://journals.openedition.org/discours/9179sentence productioncontrastSpecific Language Impairmentreferential choicesgrammatical rolediscourse accessibility |
| spellingShingle | Maja Stegenwallner-Schütz Flavia Adani Referential Choices and Specific Language Impairment: Sensitivity to Contrast Levels and Grammatical Role Discours sentence production contrast Specific Language Impairment referential choices grammatical role discourse accessibility |
| title | Referential Choices and Specific Language Impairment: Sensitivity to Contrast Levels and Grammatical Role |
| title_full | Referential Choices and Specific Language Impairment: Sensitivity to Contrast Levels and Grammatical Role |
| title_fullStr | Referential Choices and Specific Language Impairment: Sensitivity to Contrast Levels and Grammatical Role |
| title_full_unstemmed | Referential Choices and Specific Language Impairment: Sensitivity to Contrast Levels and Grammatical Role |
| title_short | Referential Choices and Specific Language Impairment: Sensitivity to Contrast Levels and Grammatical Role |
| title_sort | referential choices and specific language impairment sensitivity to contrast levels and grammatical role |
| topic | sentence production contrast Specific Language Impairment referential choices grammatical role discourse accessibility |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/discours/9179 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT majastegenwallnerschutz referentialchoicesandspecificlanguageimpairmentsensitivitytocontrastlevelsandgrammaticalrole AT flaviaadani referentialchoicesandspecificlanguageimpairmentsensitivitytocontrastlevelsandgrammaticalrole |