Evaluation of the EndoPAT as a Tool to Assess Endothelial Function

Endothelial dysfunction is a potential target for (pharmaceutical) intervention of several systemic pathological conditions. We investigated the feasibility of the EndoPAT to evaluate acute changes in endothelial function with repeated noninvasive measurements and assessed its discriminating power i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Moerland, A. J. Kales, L. Schrier, M. G. J. van Dongen, D. Bradnock, J. Burggraaf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Vascular Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/904141
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554335306776576
author M. Moerland
A. J. Kales
L. Schrier
M. G. J. van Dongen
D. Bradnock
J. Burggraaf
author_facet M. Moerland
A. J. Kales
L. Schrier
M. G. J. van Dongen
D. Bradnock
J. Burggraaf
author_sort M. Moerland
collection DOAJ
description Endothelial dysfunction is a potential target for (pharmaceutical) intervention of several systemic pathological conditions. We investigated the feasibility of the EndoPAT to evaluate acute changes in endothelial function with repeated noninvasive measurements and assessed its discriminating power in different populations. Endothelial function was stable over a longer period of time in renally impaired patients (coefficient of variation 13%). Endothelial function in renally impaired and type 2 diabetic patients was not decreased compared to healthy volunteers (2.9±1.4 and 1.8±0.3, resp., versus 1.8±0.5, P>0.05). The EndoPAT did not detect an effect of robust interventions on endothelial function in healthy volunteers (glucose load: change from baseline 0.08±0.50, 95% confidence interval −0.44 to 0.60; smoking: change from baseline 0.49±0.92, 95% confidence interval −0.47 to 1.46). This suggests that at present the EndoPAT might not be suitable to assess (changes in) endothelial function in early-phase clinical pharmacology studies. Endothelial function as measured by the EndoPAT could be physiologically different from endothelial function as measured by conventional techniques. This should be investigated carefully before the EndoPAT can be considered a useful tool in drug development or clinical practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-096c261dc53c4023a49c3901a56188c6
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2824
2090-2832
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Vascular Medicine
spelling doaj-art-096c261dc53c4023a49c3901a56188c62025-02-03T05:51:48ZengWileyInternational Journal of Vascular Medicine2090-28242090-28322012-01-01201210.1155/2012/904141904141Evaluation of the EndoPAT as a Tool to Assess Endothelial FunctionM. Moerland0A. J. Kales1L. Schrier2M. G. J. van Dongen3D. Bradnock4J. Burggraaf5Centre for Human Drug Research, Department of Vascular Medicine, Zernikefdreef 10, 2333 CL Leiden, The NetherlandsCentre for Human Drug Research, Department of Vascular Medicine, Zernikefdreef 10, 2333 CL Leiden, The NetherlandsCentre for Human Drug Research, Department of Vascular Medicine, Zernikefdreef 10, 2333 CL Leiden, The NetherlandsCentre for Human Drug Research, Department of Vascular Medicine, Zernikefdreef 10, 2333 CL Leiden, The NetherlandsCentre for Human Drug Research, Department of Vascular Medicine, Zernikefdreef 10, 2333 CL Leiden, The NetherlandsCentre for Human Drug Research, Department of Vascular Medicine, Zernikefdreef 10, 2333 CL Leiden, The NetherlandsEndothelial dysfunction is a potential target for (pharmaceutical) intervention of several systemic pathological conditions. We investigated the feasibility of the EndoPAT to evaluate acute changes in endothelial function with repeated noninvasive measurements and assessed its discriminating power in different populations. Endothelial function was stable over a longer period of time in renally impaired patients (coefficient of variation 13%). Endothelial function in renally impaired and type 2 diabetic patients was not decreased compared to healthy volunteers (2.9±1.4 and 1.8±0.3, resp., versus 1.8±0.5, P>0.05). The EndoPAT did not detect an effect of robust interventions on endothelial function in healthy volunteers (glucose load: change from baseline 0.08±0.50, 95% confidence interval −0.44 to 0.60; smoking: change from baseline 0.49±0.92, 95% confidence interval −0.47 to 1.46). This suggests that at present the EndoPAT might not be suitable to assess (changes in) endothelial function in early-phase clinical pharmacology studies. Endothelial function as measured by the EndoPAT could be physiologically different from endothelial function as measured by conventional techniques. This should be investigated carefully before the EndoPAT can be considered a useful tool in drug development or clinical practice.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/904141
spellingShingle M. Moerland
A. J. Kales
L. Schrier
M. G. J. van Dongen
D. Bradnock
J. Burggraaf
Evaluation of the EndoPAT as a Tool to Assess Endothelial Function
International Journal of Vascular Medicine
title Evaluation of the EndoPAT as a Tool to Assess Endothelial Function
title_full Evaluation of the EndoPAT as a Tool to Assess Endothelial Function
title_fullStr Evaluation of the EndoPAT as a Tool to Assess Endothelial Function
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the EndoPAT as a Tool to Assess Endothelial Function
title_short Evaluation of the EndoPAT as a Tool to Assess Endothelial Function
title_sort evaluation of the endopat as a tool to assess endothelial function
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/904141
work_keys_str_mv AT mmoerland evaluationoftheendopatasatooltoassessendothelialfunction
AT ajkales evaluationoftheendopatasatooltoassessendothelialfunction
AT lschrier evaluationoftheendopatasatooltoassessendothelialfunction
AT mgjvandongen evaluationoftheendopatasatooltoassessendothelialfunction
AT dbradnock evaluationoftheendopatasatooltoassessendothelialfunction
AT jburggraaf evaluationoftheendopatasatooltoassessendothelialfunction