Resting Full-Cycle Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve: A SWEDEHEART-Registry-Based Comparison of Two Physiological Indexes for Assessing Coronary Stenosis Severity
The adenosine-requiring physiological index fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold-standard method for determining the significance of intermediate lesions, while the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) is a novel nonhyperaemic index without the need for adenosine administration. The aim of this study...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Stephen Malmberg, Jörg Lauermann, Patric Karlström, Dario Gulin, Neshro Barmano |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6461691 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Myocardial Microvascular Physiology in Acute and Chronic Coronary Syndromes, Aortic Stenosis, and Heart Failure
by: Alf I. Larsen, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Glucocorticoid Functional Reserve in Full-Spectrum Intensity of Primary Hypothyroidism
by: René Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Deformation Control in Rest-to-Rest Motion of Mechanisms with Flexible Links
by: Roberto Caracciolo, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Stenosis Geometry on the Coronary Diagnostic Parameters
by: Sarfaraz Kamangar, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Invasive Assessment, and Future Directions
by: Jo M. Zelis, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)