Identifying the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Emotion Regulation Among Youth Using the JoyPop App: Survey Study

BackgroundThe minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is an important threshold to consider when evaluating the meaningfulness of improvement following an intervention. The JoyPop app is an evidence-based smartphone app designed to improve resilience and emotion regula...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaidyn Charlton, Ishaq Malik, Angela M Ashley, Amanda Newton, Elaine Toombs, Fred Schmidt, Janine V Olthuis, Kristine Stasiuk, Tina Bobinski, Aislin Mushquash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-01-01
Series:JMIR Formative Research
Online Access:https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e64483
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832590443838177280
author Jaidyn Charlton
Ishaq Malik
Angela M Ashley
Amanda Newton
Elaine Toombs
Fred Schmidt
Janine V Olthuis
Kristine Stasiuk
Tina Bobinski
Aislin Mushquash
author_facet Jaidyn Charlton
Ishaq Malik
Angela M Ashley
Amanda Newton
Elaine Toombs
Fred Schmidt
Janine V Olthuis
Kristine Stasiuk
Tina Bobinski
Aislin Mushquash
author_sort Jaidyn Charlton
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is an important threshold to consider when evaluating the meaningfulness of improvement following an intervention. The JoyPop app is an evidence-based smartphone app designed to improve resilience and emotion regulation. Information is needed regarding the JoyPop app’s MCID among culturally diverse youth. ObjectiveThis study aims to calculate the MCID for youth using the JoyPop app and to explore how the MCID may differ for a subset of Indigenous youth. MethodsYouth (N=36; aged 12-18 years) were recruited to use the JoyPop app for up to 4 weeks as part of a larger pilot evaluation. Results were based on measures completed after 2 weeks of app use. The MCID was calculated using emotion regulation change scores (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation–Short Form [DERS-SF]) and subjective ratings on the Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS). This MCID calculation was completed for youth overall and separately for Indigenous youth only. ResultsA significant correlation between GRCS scores and change scores on the DERS-SF supported face validity (r=–0.37; P=.04). The MCID in emotion regulation following the use of the JoyPop app for youth overall was 2.80 on the DERS-SF. The MCID for Indigenous youth was 4.29 on the DERS-SF. In addition, most youth reported improved emotion regulation after using the JoyPop app. ConclusionsThese MCID findings provide a meaningful threshold for improvement in emotion regulation for the JoyPop app. They provide potential effect sizes and can aid in sample size estimations for future research with the JoyPop app or e-mental health technologies in general. The difference between overall youth and Indigenous youth MCID values also highlights the importance of patient-oriented ratings of symptom improvement as well as cultural considerations when conducting intervention research and monitoring new interventions in clinical practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-094554fda3b144e9a5deea57947d926b
institution Kabale University
issn 2561-326X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Formative Research
spelling doaj-art-094554fda3b144e9a5deea57947d926b2025-01-23T15:00:53ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Formative Research2561-326X2025-01-019e6448310.2196/64483Identifying the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Emotion Regulation Among Youth Using the JoyPop App: Survey StudyJaidyn Charltonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-6174Ishaq Malikhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1228-208XAngela M Ashleyhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-7121-8296Amanda Newtonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3020-674XElaine Toombshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9863-2713Fred Schmidthttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9860-2437Janine V Olthuishttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3538-7682Kristine Stasiukhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-7489-9757Tina Bobinskihttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-3153-4628Aislin Mushquashhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4494-1326 BackgroundThe minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is an important threshold to consider when evaluating the meaningfulness of improvement following an intervention. The JoyPop app is an evidence-based smartphone app designed to improve resilience and emotion regulation. Information is needed regarding the JoyPop app’s MCID among culturally diverse youth. ObjectiveThis study aims to calculate the MCID for youth using the JoyPop app and to explore how the MCID may differ for a subset of Indigenous youth. MethodsYouth (N=36; aged 12-18 years) were recruited to use the JoyPop app for up to 4 weeks as part of a larger pilot evaluation. Results were based on measures completed after 2 weeks of app use. The MCID was calculated using emotion regulation change scores (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation–Short Form [DERS-SF]) and subjective ratings on the Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS). This MCID calculation was completed for youth overall and separately for Indigenous youth only. ResultsA significant correlation between GRCS scores and change scores on the DERS-SF supported face validity (r=–0.37; P=.04). The MCID in emotion regulation following the use of the JoyPop app for youth overall was 2.80 on the DERS-SF. The MCID for Indigenous youth was 4.29 on the DERS-SF. In addition, most youth reported improved emotion regulation after using the JoyPop app. ConclusionsThese MCID findings provide a meaningful threshold for improvement in emotion regulation for the JoyPop app. They provide potential effect sizes and can aid in sample size estimations for future research with the JoyPop app or e-mental health technologies in general. The difference between overall youth and Indigenous youth MCID values also highlights the importance of patient-oriented ratings of symptom improvement as well as cultural considerations when conducting intervention research and monitoring new interventions in clinical practice.https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e64483
spellingShingle Jaidyn Charlton
Ishaq Malik
Angela M Ashley
Amanda Newton
Elaine Toombs
Fred Schmidt
Janine V Olthuis
Kristine Stasiuk
Tina Bobinski
Aislin Mushquash
Identifying the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Emotion Regulation Among Youth Using the JoyPop App: Survey Study
JMIR Formative Research
title Identifying the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Emotion Regulation Among Youth Using the JoyPop App: Survey Study
title_full Identifying the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Emotion Regulation Among Youth Using the JoyPop App: Survey Study
title_fullStr Identifying the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Emotion Regulation Among Youth Using the JoyPop App: Survey Study
title_full_unstemmed Identifying the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Emotion Regulation Among Youth Using the JoyPop App: Survey Study
title_short Identifying the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Emotion Regulation Among Youth Using the JoyPop App: Survey Study
title_sort identifying the minimal clinically important difference in emotion regulation among youth using the joypop app survey study
url https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e64483
work_keys_str_mv AT jaidyncharlton identifyingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinemotionregulationamongyouthusingthejoypopappsurveystudy
AT ishaqmalik identifyingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinemotionregulationamongyouthusingthejoypopappsurveystudy
AT angelamashley identifyingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinemotionregulationamongyouthusingthejoypopappsurveystudy
AT amandanewton identifyingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinemotionregulationamongyouthusingthejoypopappsurveystudy
AT elainetoombs identifyingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinemotionregulationamongyouthusingthejoypopappsurveystudy
AT fredschmidt identifyingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinemotionregulationamongyouthusingthejoypopappsurveystudy
AT janinevolthuis identifyingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinemotionregulationamongyouthusingthejoypopappsurveystudy
AT kristinestasiuk identifyingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinemotionregulationamongyouthusingthejoypopappsurveystudy
AT tinabobinski identifyingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinemotionregulationamongyouthusingthejoypopappsurveystudy
AT aislinmushquash identifyingtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceinemotionregulationamongyouthusingthejoypopappsurveystudy