Altruistic Punishment, Status Conflict, and Knowledge Sharing in the Workplace: An Evolutionary Game Model

Second- and third-party altruistic punishments can both improve knowledge sharing, but it is debatable which does so better. We thus concurrently consider the influence of status conflict advantage and disadvantage on knowledge sharing. We also analyze knowledge sharing by introducing an evolutionar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fang Song, Xiwu Hu, Junfeng Li, Michael Allen Watson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5551625
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550882028290048
author Fang Song
Xiwu Hu
Junfeng Li
Michael Allen Watson
author_facet Fang Song
Xiwu Hu
Junfeng Li
Michael Allen Watson
author_sort Fang Song
collection DOAJ
description Second- and third-party altruistic punishments can both improve knowledge sharing, but it is debatable which does so better. We thus concurrently consider the influence of status conflict advantage and disadvantage on knowledge sharing. We also analyze knowledge sharing by introducing an evolutionary game model and conducting simulations, and reveal the following: (1) the appropriate choice for an organization that is increasing its knowledge contribution is third-party punishment; (2) the status conflict advantage and disadvantage play important roles in knowledge sharing. When the status conflict advantage is greater than the disadvantage, the two players eventually share knowledge, and vice versa. Interestingly, when the status conflict advantage is equal to the disadvantage, the player with the stronger sharing inclination has a powerful impact on the player who would rather hoard knowledge, thus ultimately leading him/her to share. (3) Guanxi, knowledge capacity, and synergy revenue have positive effects on knowledge sharing, while the knowledge sharing cost has a negative influence on them. Moreover, the stable equilibrium result is affected by the initial system state. In sum, our results not only promote the understanding of altruistic punishment and status conflict regarding knowledge sharing but also provide practical implications for both organizations and leaders.
format Article
id doaj-art-091a1300f9fb437ba3c06100804a45e8
institution Kabale University
issn 1026-0226
1607-887X
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
spelling doaj-art-091a1300f9fb437ba3c06100804a45e82025-02-03T06:05:26ZengWileyDiscrete Dynamics in Nature and Society1026-02261607-887X2021-01-01202110.1155/2021/55516255551625Altruistic Punishment, Status Conflict, and Knowledge Sharing in the Workplace: An Evolutionary Game ModelFang Song0Xiwu Hu1Junfeng Li2Michael Allen Watson3School of Economics and Management, Qinghai Nationalities University, Xining, Qinghai, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Qinghai Nationalities University, Xining, Qinghai, ChinaSchool of Economics, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, ChinaUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USASecond- and third-party altruistic punishments can both improve knowledge sharing, but it is debatable which does so better. We thus concurrently consider the influence of status conflict advantage and disadvantage on knowledge sharing. We also analyze knowledge sharing by introducing an evolutionary game model and conducting simulations, and reveal the following: (1) the appropriate choice for an organization that is increasing its knowledge contribution is third-party punishment; (2) the status conflict advantage and disadvantage play important roles in knowledge sharing. When the status conflict advantage is greater than the disadvantage, the two players eventually share knowledge, and vice versa. Interestingly, when the status conflict advantage is equal to the disadvantage, the player with the stronger sharing inclination has a powerful impact on the player who would rather hoard knowledge, thus ultimately leading him/her to share. (3) Guanxi, knowledge capacity, and synergy revenue have positive effects on knowledge sharing, while the knowledge sharing cost has a negative influence on them. Moreover, the stable equilibrium result is affected by the initial system state. In sum, our results not only promote the understanding of altruistic punishment and status conflict regarding knowledge sharing but also provide practical implications for both organizations and leaders.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5551625
spellingShingle Fang Song
Xiwu Hu
Junfeng Li
Michael Allen Watson
Altruistic Punishment, Status Conflict, and Knowledge Sharing in the Workplace: An Evolutionary Game Model
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
title Altruistic Punishment, Status Conflict, and Knowledge Sharing in the Workplace: An Evolutionary Game Model
title_full Altruistic Punishment, Status Conflict, and Knowledge Sharing in the Workplace: An Evolutionary Game Model
title_fullStr Altruistic Punishment, Status Conflict, and Knowledge Sharing in the Workplace: An Evolutionary Game Model
title_full_unstemmed Altruistic Punishment, Status Conflict, and Knowledge Sharing in the Workplace: An Evolutionary Game Model
title_short Altruistic Punishment, Status Conflict, and Knowledge Sharing in the Workplace: An Evolutionary Game Model
title_sort altruistic punishment status conflict and knowledge sharing in the workplace an evolutionary game model
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5551625
work_keys_str_mv AT fangsong altruisticpunishmentstatusconflictandknowledgesharingintheworkplaceanevolutionarygamemodel
AT xiwuhu altruisticpunishmentstatusconflictandknowledgesharingintheworkplaceanevolutionarygamemodel
AT junfengli altruisticpunishmentstatusconflictandknowledgesharingintheworkplaceanevolutionarygamemodel
AT michaelallenwatson altruisticpunishmentstatusconflictandknowledgesharingintheworkplaceanevolutionarygamemodel