Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Abstract The Inter-American Court of Human Rights performs a wide evidentiary analysis, which tends to be very flexible in its admission of evidence. This paper tries to decipher the extent, applicability, and content of the Court’s admissibility rules, both the norms established by the Court itself...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Álvaro Paúl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Escola de Direito
Series:Revista Direito GV
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-24322017000200653&lng=en&tlng=en
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832569569858813952
author Álvaro Paúl
author_facet Álvaro Paúl
author_sort Álvaro Paúl
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The Inter-American Court of Human Rights performs a wide evidentiary analysis, which tends to be very flexible in its admission of evidence. This paper tries to decipher the extent, applicability, and content of the Court’s admissibility rules, both the norms established by the Court itself, and those that the Court is obliged to follow. In order to do so, this article will analyze the relevant case law of the Court and provide some examples. Within this analysis, this article refers in depth to some unclear rulings that the Court has made in relation to the exclusion of evidence obtained via coercion, some of which seem to clash with the central role of truth in the Inter-American system.
format Article
id doaj-art-08ccaa7986684f338cac7036fdf476bb
institution Kabale University
issn 2317-6172
language English
publisher Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Escola de Direito
record_format Article
series Revista Direito GV
spelling doaj-art-08ccaa7986684f338cac7036fdf476bb2025-02-02T20:01:49ZengFundação Getúlio Vargas, Escola de DireitoRevista Direito GV2317-617213265367610.1590/2317-6172201726S1808-24322017000200653Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human RightsÁlvaro PaúlAbstract The Inter-American Court of Human Rights performs a wide evidentiary analysis, which tends to be very flexible in its admission of evidence. This paper tries to decipher the extent, applicability, and content of the Court’s admissibility rules, both the norms established by the Court itself, and those that the Court is obliged to follow. In order to do so, this article will analyze the relevant case law of the Court and provide some examples. Within this analysis, this article refers in depth to some unclear rulings that the Court has made in relation to the exclusion of evidence obtained via coercion, some of which seem to clash with the central role of truth in the Inter-American system.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-24322017000200653&lng=en&tlng=enAdmissibilityevidenceexclusionfruit of the poisonous treeInter-American Court of Human Rightsright to the truth
spellingShingle Álvaro Paúl
Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Revista Direito GV
Admissibility
evidence
exclusion
fruit of the poisonous tree
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
right to the truth
title Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
title_full Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
title_fullStr Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
title_full_unstemmed Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
title_short Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
title_sort admissibility of evidence before the inter american court of human rights
topic Admissibility
evidence
exclusion
fruit of the poisonous tree
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
right to the truth
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-24322017000200653&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT alvaropaul admissibilityofevidencebeforetheinteramericancourtofhumanrights