Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Abstract The Inter-American Court of Human Rights performs a wide evidentiary analysis, which tends to be very flexible in its admission of evidence. This paper tries to decipher the extent, applicability, and content of the Court’s admissibility rules, both the norms established by the Court itself...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Escola de Direito
|
Series: | Revista Direito GV |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-24322017000200653&lng=en&tlng=en |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832569569858813952 |
---|---|
author | Álvaro Paúl |
author_facet | Álvaro Paúl |
author_sort | Álvaro Paúl |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract The Inter-American Court of Human Rights performs a wide evidentiary analysis, which tends to be very flexible in its admission of evidence. This paper tries to decipher the extent, applicability, and content of the Court’s admissibility rules, both the norms established by the Court itself, and those that the Court is obliged to follow. In order to do so, this article will analyze the relevant case law of the Court and provide some examples. Within this analysis, this article refers in depth to some unclear rulings that the Court has made in relation to the exclusion of evidence obtained via coercion, some of which seem to clash with the central role of truth in the Inter-American system. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-08ccaa7986684f338cac7036fdf476bb |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2317-6172 |
language | English |
publisher | Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Escola de Direito |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Direito GV |
spelling | doaj-art-08ccaa7986684f338cac7036fdf476bb2025-02-02T20:01:49ZengFundação Getúlio Vargas, Escola de DireitoRevista Direito GV2317-617213265367610.1590/2317-6172201726S1808-24322017000200653Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human RightsÁlvaro PaúlAbstract The Inter-American Court of Human Rights performs a wide evidentiary analysis, which tends to be very flexible in its admission of evidence. This paper tries to decipher the extent, applicability, and content of the Court’s admissibility rules, both the norms established by the Court itself, and those that the Court is obliged to follow. In order to do so, this article will analyze the relevant case law of the Court and provide some examples. Within this analysis, this article refers in depth to some unclear rulings that the Court has made in relation to the exclusion of evidence obtained via coercion, some of which seem to clash with the central role of truth in the Inter-American system.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-24322017000200653&lng=en&tlng=enAdmissibilityevidenceexclusionfruit of the poisonous treeInter-American Court of Human Rightsright to the truth |
spellingShingle | Álvaro Paúl Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights Revista Direito GV Admissibility evidence exclusion fruit of the poisonous tree Inter-American Court of Human Rights right to the truth |
title | Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights |
title_full | Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights |
title_fullStr | Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights |
title_full_unstemmed | Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights |
title_short | Admissibility of evidence before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights |
title_sort | admissibility of evidence before the inter american court of human rights |
topic | Admissibility evidence exclusion fruit of the poisonous tree Inter-American Court of Human Rights right to the truth |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-24322017000200653&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvaropaul admissibilityofevidencebeforetheinteramericancourtofhumanrights |