Secondary Subacromial Impingement after Valgus Closing-Wedge Osteotomy for Proximal Humerus Varus

A 31-year-old construction worker had been suffering from both the motion pain and the restriction of elevation in his right shoulder due to severe varus deformity of humeral neck, which occurred after proximal humeral fracture. The angle for shoulder flexion and abduction was restricted to 50 and 8...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hirotaka Sano, Masayuki Kamimura, Akira Oizumi, Shuji Isefuku
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Orthopedics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/652096
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545279872598016
author Hirotaka Sano
Masayuki Kamimura
Akira Oizumi
Shuji Isefuku
author_facet Hirotaka Sano
Masayuki Kamimura
Akira Oizumi
Shuji Isefuku
author_sort Hirotaka Sano
collection DOAJ
description A 31-year-old construction worker had been suffering from both the motion pain and the restriction of elevation in his right shoulder due to severe varus deformity of humeral neck, which occurred after proximal humeral fracture. The angle for shoulder flexion and abduction was restricted to 50 and 80 degrees, respectively. Valgus closing-wedge osteotomy followed by the internal fixation using a locking plate was carried out at 12 months after injury. Postoperatively, the head-shaft angle of the humerus improved from 65 to 138 degrees. Active flexion and abduction angles improved from 80 to 135 degrees and from 50 to 135 degrees, respectively. However, the patient complained from a sharp pain with a clicking sound during shoulder abduction even after removal of the locking plate. Since subacromial steroid injection temporarily relieved his shoulder pain, we assumed that the secondary subacromial impingement was provoked after osteotomy. Thus, arthroscopic subacromial decompression was carried out at 27 months after the initial operation, which finally relieved his symptoms. In the valgus closing-wedge osteotomy, surgeons should pay attention to the condition of subacromial space to avoid causing the secondary subacromial impingement.
format Article
id doaj-art-08acb22a2efd45a6a7c8303b6d82e97d
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6749
2090-6757
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Orthopedics
spelling doaj-art-08acb22a2efd45a6a7c8303b6d82e97d2025-02-03T07:26:16ZengWileyCase Reports in Orthopedics2090-67492090-67572015-01-01201510.1155/2015/652096652096Secondary Subacromial Impingement after Valgus Closing-Wedge Osteotomy for Proximal Humerus VarusHirotaka Sano0Masayuki Kamimura1Akira Oizumi2Shuji Isefuku3Division of Orthopedics, Sendai City Hospital, 1-1-1 Asutonagamachi, Taihaku-ku, Sendai 982-8502, JapanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, JapanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kurihara Central Hospital, Miyagi, JapanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, JapanA 31-year-old construction worker had been suffering from both the motion pain and the restriction of elevation in his right shoulder due to severe varus deformity of humeral neck, which occurred after proximal humeral fracture. The angle for shoulder flexion and abduction was restricted to 50 and 80 degrees, respectively. Valgus closing-wedge osteotomy followed by the internal fixation using a locking plate was carried out at 12 months after injury. Postoperatively, the head-shaft angle of the humerus improved from 65 to 138 degrees. Active flexion and abduction angles improved from 80 to 135 degrees and from 50 to 135 degrees, respectively. However, the patient complained from a sharp pain with a clicking sound during shoulder abduction even after removal of the locking plate. Since subacromial steroid injection temporarily relieved his shoulder pain, we assumed that the secondary subacromial impingement was provoked after osteotomy. Thus, arthroscopic subacromial decompression was carried out at 27 months after the initial operation, which finally relieved his symptoms. In the valgus closing-wedge osteotomy, surgeons should pay attention to the condition of subacromial space to avoid causing the secondary subacromial impingement.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/652096
spellingShingle Hirotaka Sano
Masayuki Kamimura
Akira Oizumi
Shuji Isefuku
Secondary Subacromial Impingement after Valgus Closing-Wedge Osteotomy for Proximal Humerus Varus
Case Reports in Orthopedics
title Secondary Subacromial Impingement after Valgus Closing-Wedge Osteotomy for Proximal Humerus Varus
title_full Secondary Subacromial Impingement after Valgus Closing-Wedge Osteotomy for Proximal Humerus Varus
title_fullStr Secondary Subacromial Impingement after Valgus Closing-Wedge Osteotomy for Proximal Humerus Varus
title_full_unstemmed Secondary Subacromial Impingement after Valgus Closing-Wedge Osteotomy for Proximal Humerus Varus
title_short Secondary Subacromial Impingement after Valgus Closing-Wedge Osteotomy for Proximal Humerus Varus
title_sort secondary subacromial impingement after valgus closing wedge osteotomy for proximal humerus varus
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/652096
work_keys_str_mv AT hirotakasano secondarysubacromialimpingementaftervalgusclosingwedgeosteotomyforproximalhumerusvarus
AT masayukikamimura secondarysubacromialimpingementaftervalgusclosingwedgeosteotomyforproximalhumerusvarus
AT akiraoizumi secondarysubacromialimpingementaftervalgusclosingwedgeosteotomyforproximalhumerusvarus
AT shujiisefuku secondarysubacromialimpingementaftervalgusclosingwedgeosteotomyforproximalhumerusvarus