A Clinical and Confocal Microscopic Comparison of Transepithelial PRK and LASEK for Myopia

Purpose. To compare the clinical and confocal microscopic results of transepithelial PRK versus LASEK for correction of myopia. Materials and Methods. Twelve patients with myopia received transepithelial PRK in one eye and LASEK in the other. In transepithelial PRK-treated eyes, the corneal epithel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Safak Korkmaz, Kamil Bilgihan, Sabahattin Sul, Ahmet Hondur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/784185
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832565419254218752
author Safak Korkmaz
Kamil Bilgihan
Sabahattin Sul
Ahmet Hondur
author_facet Safak Korkmaz
Kamil Bilgihan
Sabahattin Sul
Ahmet Hondur
author_sort Safak Korkmaz
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare the clinical and confocal microscopic results of transepithelial PRK versus LASEK for correction of myopia. Materials and Methods. Twelve patients with myopia received transepithelial PRK in one eye and LASEK in the other. In transepithelial PRK-treated eyes, the corneal epithelium was removed with 40 microns of excimer laser ablation and in LASEK-treated eyes with 25-second application of 18% ethanol. Time to epithelial healing, ocular discomfort, uncorrected and best corrected visual acuities, manifest refraction, haze, greyscale value, and keratocyte apoptosis in confocal microscopy were recorded. Results. The mean time to epithelial healing was significantly longer after LASEK (4.00 ± 0.43 versus 3.17 ± 0.6 days). On day 1, ocular discomfort was significantly higher after transepithelial PRK. The grade of haze, keratocyte apoptosis, and greyscale value in confocal microscopy were significantly higher in transepithelial PRK-treated eyes at 1 month. All transepithelial PRK- and LASEK-treated eyes achieved 20/25 or better UCVA and were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia at final visits. Conclusions. Both transepithelial PRK and LASEK offer effective correction of myopia at 1 year. However, LASEK appeared to induce less discomfort and less intense wound healing in the early postoperative period.
format Article
id doaj-art-0802359f5fde4c74a0afb6c21a89c145
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-0802359f5fde4c74a0afb6c21a89c1452025-02-03T01:07:44ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582014-01-01201410.1155/2014/784185784185A Clinical and Confocal Microscopic Comparison of Transepithelial PRK and LASEK for MyopiaSafak Korkmaz0Kamil Bilgihan1Sabahattin Sul2Ahmet Hondur3Department of Ophthalmology, Düzce State Hospital, Düzce, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gazi University Medical School, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yatağan State Hospital, 48500 Muğla, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gazi University Medical School, Ankara, TurkeyPurpose. To compare the clinical and confocal microscopic results of transepithelial PRK versus LASEK for correction of myopia. Materials and Methods. Twelve patients with myopia received transepithelial PRK in one eye and LASEK in the other. In transepithelial PRK-treated eyes, the corneal epithelium was removed with 40 microns of excimer laser ablation and in LASEK-treated eyes with 25-second application of 18% ethanol. Time to epithelial healing, ocular discomfort, uncorrected and best corrected visual acuities, manifest refraction, haze, greyscale value, and keratocyte apoptosis in confocal microscopy were recorded. Results. The mean time to epithelial healing was significantly longer after LASEK (4.00 ± 0.43 versus 3.17 ± 0.6 days). On day 1, ocular discomfort was significantly higher after transepithelial PRK. The grade of haze, keratocyte apoptosis, and greyscale value in confocal microscopy were significantly higher in transepithelial PRK-treated eyes at 1 month. All transepithelial PRK- and LASEK-treated eyes achieved 20/25 or better UCVA and were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia at final visits. Conclusions. Both transepithelial PRK and LASEK offer effective correction of myopia at 1 year. However, LASEK appeared to induce less discomfort and less intense wound healing in the early postoperative period.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/784185
spellingShingle Safak Korkmaz
Kamil Bilgihan
Sabahattin Sul
Ahmet Hondur
A Clinical and Confocal Microscopic Comparison of Transepithelial PRK and LASEK for Myopia
Journal of Ophthalmology
title A Clinical and Confocal Microscopic Comparison of Transepithelial PRK and LASEK for Myopia
title_full A Clinical and Confocal Microscopic Comparison of Transepithelial PRK and LASEK for Myopia
title_fullStr A Clinical and Confocal Microscopic Comparison of Transepithelial PRK and LASEK for Myopia
title_full_unstemmed A Clinical and Confocal Microscopic Comparison of Transepithelial PRK and LASEK for Myopia
title_short A Clinical and Confocal Microscopic Comparison of Transepithelial PRK and LASEK for Myopia
title_sort clinical and confocal microscopic comparison of transepithelial prk and lasek for myopia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/784185
work_keys_str_mv AT safakkorkmaz aclinicalandconfocalmicroscopiccomparisonoftransepithelialprkandlasekformyopia
AT kamilbilgihan aclinicalandconfocalmicroscopiccomparisonoftransepithelialprkandlasekformyopia
AT sabahattinsul aclinicalandconfocalmicroscopiccomparisonoftransepithelialprkandlasekformyopia
AT ahmethondur aclinicalandconfocalmicroscopiccomparisonoftransepithelialprkandlasekformyopia
AT safakkorkmaz clinicalandconfocalmicroscopiccomparisonoftransepithelialprkandlasekformyopia
AT kamilbilgihan clinicalandconfocalmicroscopiccomparisonoftransepithelialprkandlasekformyopia
AT sabahattinsul clinicalandconfocalmicroscopiccomparisonoftransepithelialprkandlasekformyopia
AT ahmethondur clinicalandconfocalmicroscopiccomparisonoftransepithelialprkandlasekformyopia