Demand creation for HIV testing services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

<h4>Background</h4>HIV testing services (HTS) are the first steps in reaching the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals to achieve and maintain low HIV incidence. Evaluating the effectiveness of different demand creation interventions to increase uptake of efficient and effective HTS is useful to priori...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anjuli D Wagner, Irene N Njuguna, Jillian Neary, Kendall A Lawley, Diana K N Louden, Ruchi Tiwari, Wenwen Jiang, Ngozi Kalu, Rachael M Burke, Dorothy Mangale, Chris Obermeyer, Jaclyn N Escudero, Michelle A Bulterys, Chloe Waters, Bastien Mollo, Hannah Han, Magdalena Barr-DiChiara, Rachel Baggaley, Muhammad S Jamil, Purvi Shah, Vincent J Wong, Alison L Drake, Cheryl C Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-03-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004169&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850159704757501952
author Anjuli D Wagner
Irene N Njuguna
Jillian Neary
Kendall A Lawley
Diana K N Louden
Ruchi Tiwari
Wenwen Jiang
Ngozi Kalu
Rachael M Burke
Dorothy Mangale
Chris Obermeyer
Jaclyn N Escudero
Michelle A Bulterys
Chloe Waters
Bastien Mollo
Hannah Han
Magdalena Barr-DiChiara
Rachel Baggaley
Muhammad S Jamil
Purvi Shah
Vincent J Wong
Alison L Drake
Cheryl C Johnson
author_facet Anjuli D Wagner
Irene N Njuguna
Jillian Neary
Kendall A Lawley
Diana K N Louden
Ruchi Tiwari
Wenwen Jiang
Ngozi Kalu
Rachael M Burke
Dorothy Mangale
Chris Obermeyer
Jaclyn N Escudero
Michelle A Bulterys
Chloe Waters
Bastien Mollo
Hannah Han
Magdalena Barr-DiChiara
Rachel Baggaley
Muhammad S Jamil
Purvi Shah
Vincent J Wong
Alison L Drake
Cheryl C Johnson
author_sort Anjuli D Wagner
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>HIV testing services (HTS) are the first steps in reaching the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals to achieve and maintain low HIV incidence. Evaluating the effectiveness of different demand creation interventions to increase uptake of efficient and effective HTS is useful to prioritize limited programmatic resources. This review was undertaken to inform World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 HIV testing guidelines and assessed the research question, "Which demand creation strategies are effective for enhancing uptake of HTS?" focused on populations globally.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>The following electronic databases were searched through September 28, 2021: PubMed, PsycInfo, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE, and Global Health Database; we searched IAS and AIDS conferences. We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any demand creation intervention (incentives, mobilization, counseling, tailoring, and digital interventions) to either a control or other demand creation intervention and reported HTS uptake. We pooled trials to evaluate categories of demand creation interventions using random-effects models for meta-analysis and assessed study quality with Cochrane's risk of bias 1 tool. This study was funded by the WHO and registered in Prospero with ID CRD42022296947. We screened 10,583 records and 507 conference abstracts, reviewed 952 full texts, and included 124 RCTs for data extraction. The majority of studies were from the African (N = 53) and Americas (N = 54) regions. We found that mobilization (relative risk [RR]: 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.30, 3.09], p < 0.05; risk difference [RD]: 0.29, 95% CI [0.16, 0.43], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), couple-oriented counseling (RR: 1.98, 95% CI [1.02, 3.86], p < 0.05; RD: 0.12, 95% CI [0.03, 0.21], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), peer-led interventions (RR: 1.57, 95% CI [1.15, 2.15], p < 0.05; RD: 0.18, 95% CI [0.06, 0.31], p < 0.05, N = 10 RCTs), motivation-oriented counseling (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.07, 2.20], p < 0.05; RD: 0.17, 95% CI [0.00, 0.34], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), short message service (SMS) (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.09, 2.16], p < 0.05; RD: 0.11, 95% CI [0.03, 0.19], p < 0.05, N = 5 RCTs), and conditional fixed value incentives (RR: 1.52, 95% CI [1.21, 1.91], p < 0.05; RD: 0.15, 95% CI [0.07, 0.22], p < 0.05, N = 11 RCTs) all significantly and importantly (≥50% relative increase) increased HTS uptake and had medium risk of bias. Lottery-based incentives and audio-based interventions less importantly (25% to 49% increase) but not significantly increased HTS uptake (medium risk of bias). Personal invitation letters and personalized message content significantly but not importantly (<25% increase) increased HTS uptake (medium risk of bias). Reduced duration counseling had comparable performance to standard duration counseling (low risk of bias) and video-based interventions were comparable or better than in-person counseling (medium risk of bias). Heterogeneity of effect among pooled studies was high. This study was limited in that we restricted to randomized trials, which may be systematically less readily available for key populations; additionally, we compare only pooled estimates for interventions with multiple studies rather than single study estimates, and there was evidence of publication bias for several interventions.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Mobilization, couple- and motivation-oriented counseling, peer-led interventions, conditional fixed value incentives, and SMS are high-impact demand creation interventions and should be prioritized for programmatic consideration. Reduced duration counseling and video-based interventions are an efficient and effective alternative to address staffing shortages. Investment in demand creation activities should prioritize those with undiagnosed HIV or ongoing HIV exposure. Selection of demand creation interventions must consider risks and benefits, context-specific factors, feasibility and sustainability, country ownership, and universal health coverage across disease areas.
format Article
id doaj-art-07b93d88b58a443680a18dd4f76407c7
institution OA Journals
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
language English
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Medicine
spelling doaj-art-07b93d88b58a443680a18dd4f76407c72025-08-20T02:23:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762023-03-01203e100416910.1371/journal.pmed.1004169Demand creation for HIV testing services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Anjuli D WagnerIrene N NjugunaJillian NearyKendall A LawleyDiana K N LoudenRuchi TiwariWenwen JiangNgozi KaluRachael M BurkeDorothy MangaleChris ObermeyerJaclyn N EscuderoMichelle A BulterysChloe WatersBastien MolloHannah HanMagdalena Barr-DiChiaraRachel BaggaleyMuhammad S JamilPurvi ShahVincent J WongAlison L DrakeCheryl C Johnson<h4>Background</h4>HIV testing services (HTS) are the first steps in reaching the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals to achieve and maintain low HIV incidence. Evaluating the effectiveness of different demand creation interventions to increase uptake of efficient and effective HTS is useful to prioritize limited programmatic resources. This review was undertaken to inform World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 HIV testing guidelines and assessed the research question, "Which demand creation strategies are effective for enhancing uptake of HTS?" focused on populations globally.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>The following electronic databases were searched through September 28, 2021: PubMed, PsycInfo, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE, and Global Health Database; we searched IAS and AIDS conferences. We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any demand creation intervention (incentives, mobilization, counseling, tailoring, and digital interventions) to either a control or other demand creation intervention and reported HTS uptake. We pooled trials to evaluate categories of demand creation interventions using random-effects models for meta-analysis and assessed study quality with Cochrane's risk of bias 1 tool. This study was funded by the WHO and registered in Prospero with ID CRD42022296947. We screened 10,583 records and 507 conference abstracts, reviewed 952 full texts, and included 124 RCTs for data extraction. The majority of studies were from the African (N = 53) and Americas (N = 54) regions. We found that mobilization (relative risk [RR]: 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.30, 3.09], p < 0.05; risk difference [RD]: 0.29, 95% CI [0.16, 0.43], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), couple-oriented counseling (RR: 1.98, 95% CI [1.02, 3.86], p < 0.05; RD: 0.12, 95% CI [0.03, 0.21], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), peer-led interventions (RR: 1.57, 95% CI [1.15, 2.15], p < 0.05; RD: 0.18, 95% CI [0.06, 0.31], p < 0.05, N = 10 RCTs), motivation-oriented counseling (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.07, 2.20], p < 0.05; RD: 0.17, 95% CI [0.00, 0.34], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), short message service (SMS) (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.09, 2.16], p < 0.05; RD: 0.11, 95% CI [0.03, 0.19], p < 0.05, N = 5 RCTs), and conditional fixed value incentives (RR: 1.52, 95% CI [1.21, 1.91], p < 0.05; RD: 0.15, 95% CI [0.07, 0.22], p < 0.05, N = 11 RCTs) all significantly and importantly (≥50% relative increase) increased HTS uptake and had medium risk of bias. Lottery-based incentives and audio-based interventions less importantly (25% to 49% increase) but not significantly increased HTS uptake (medium risk of bias). Personal invitation letters and personalized message content significantly but not importantly (<25% increase) increased HTS uptake (medium risk of bias). Reduced duration counseling had comparable performance to standard duration counseling (low risk of bias) and video-based interventions were comparable or better than in-person counseling (medium risk of bias). Heterogeneity of effect among pooled studies was high. This study was limited in that we restricted to randomized trials, which may be systematically less readily available for key populations; additionally, we compare only pooled estimates for interventions with multiple studies rather than single study estimates, and there was evidence of publication bias for several interventions.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Mobilization, couple- and motivation-oriented counseling, peer-led interventions, conditional fixed value incentives, and SMS are high-impact demand creation interventions and should be prioritized for programmatic consideration. Reduced duration counseling and video-based interventions are an efficient and effective alternative to address staffing shortages. Investment in demand creation activities should prioritize those with undiagnosed HIV or ongoing HIV exposure. Selection of demand creation interventions must consider risks and benefits, context-specific factors, feasibility and sustainability, country ownership, and universal health coverage across disease areas.https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004169&type=printable
spellingShingle Anjuli D Wagner
Irene N Njuguna
Jillian Neary
Kendall A Lawley
Diana K N Louden
Ruchi Tiwari
Wenwen Jiang
Ngozi Kalu
Rachael M Burke
Dorothy Mangale
Chris Obermeyer
Jaclyn N Escudero
Michelle A Bulterys
Chloe Waters
Bastien Mollo
Hannah Han
Magdalena Barr-DiChiara
Rachel Baggaley
Muhammad S Jamil
Purvi Shah
Vincent J Wong
Alison L Drake
Cheryl C Johnson
Demand creation for HIV testing services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS Medicine
title Demand creation for HIV testing services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Demand creation for HIV testing services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Demand creation for HIV testing services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Demand creation for HIV testing services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Demand creation for HIV testing services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort demand creation for hiv testing services a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004169&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT anjulidwagner demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT irenennjuguna demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jillianneary demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kendallalawley demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dianaknlouden demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ruchitiwari demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wenwenjiang demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ngozikalu demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rachaelmburke demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dorothymangale demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chrisobermeyer demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jaclynnescudero demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT michelleabulterys demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chloewaters demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bastienmollo demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hannahhan demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT magdalenabarrdichiara demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rachelbaggaley demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT muhammadsjamil demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT purvishah demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vincentjwong demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alisonldrake demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cherylcjohnson demandcreationforhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis