Biologically targeted discovery-replication scan identifies G×G interaction in relation to risk of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma

Summary: Inherited genetics represents an important contributor to risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and its precursor Barrett’s esophagus (BE). Genome-wide association studies have identified ∼30 susceptibility variants for BE/EAC, yet genetic interactions remain unexamined. To address chall...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li Yan, Qianchuan He, Shiv P. Verma, Xu Zhang, Ann-Sophie Giel, Carlo Maj, Kathryn Graz, Elnaz Naderi, Jianhong Chen, Mourad Wagdy Ali, Puya Gharahkhani, Xiang Shu, Kenneth Offit, Pari M. Shah, Hans Gerdes, Daniela Molena, Amitabh Srivastava, Stuart MacGregor, Claire Palles, René Thieme, Michael Vieth, Ines Gockel, Thomas L. Vaughan, Johannes Schumacher, Matthew F. Buas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-04-01
Series:HGG Advances
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666247725000028
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582072928043008
author Li Yan
Qianchuan He
Shiv P. Verma
Xu Zhang
Ann-Sophie Giel
Carlo Maj
Kathryn Graz
Elnaz Naderi
Jianhong Chen
Mourad Wagdy Ali
Puya Gharahkhani
Xiang Shu
Kenneth Offit
Pari M. Shah
Hans Gerdes
Daniela Molena
Amitabh Srivastava
Stuart MacGregor
Claire Palles
René Thieme
Michael Vieth
Ines Gockel
Thomas L. Vaughan
Johannes Schumacher
Matthew F. Buas
author_facet Li Yan
Qianchuan He
Shiv P. Verma
Xu Zhang
Ann-Sophie Giel
Carlo Maj
Kathryn Graz
Elnaz Naderi
Jianhong Chen
Mourad Wagdy Ali
Puya Gharahkhani
Xiang Shu
Kenneth Offit
Pari M. Shah
Hans Gerdes
Daniela Molena
Amitabh Srivastava
Stuart MacGregor
Claire Palles
René Thieme
Michael Vieth
Ines Gockel
Thomas L. Vaughan
Johannes Schumacher
Matthew F. Buas
author_sort Li Yan
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Inherited genetics represents an important contributor to risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and its precursor Barrett’s esophagus (BE). Genome-wide association studies have identified ∼30 susceptibility variants for BE/EAC, yet genetic interactions remain unexamined. To address challenges in large-scale G×G scans, we combined knowledge-guided filtering and machine learning approaches, focusing on genes with (1) known/plausible links to BE/EAC pathogenesis (n = 493) or (2) prior evidence of biological interactions (n = 4,196). Approximately 75 × 106 SNP×SNP interactions were screened via hierarchical group lasso (glinternet) using BEACON GWAS data. The top ∼2,000 interactions retained in each scan were prioritized using p values from single logistic models. Identical scans were repeated among males only (78%), with two independent GWAS datasets used for replication. In overall and male-specific primary replications, 11 of 187 and 20 of 191 interactions satisfied p < 0.05, respectively. The strongest evidence for secondary replication was for rs17744726×rs3217992 among males, with consistent directionality across all cohorts (Pmeta = 2.19 × 10−8); rs3217992 “T” was associated with reduced risk only in individuals homozygous for rs17744726 “G.” Rs3217992 maps to the CDKN2B 3′ UTR and reportedly disrupts microRNA-mediated repression. Rs17744726 maps to an intronic enhancer region in BLK. Through in silico prioritization and experimental validation, we identified a nearby proxy variant (rs4841556) as a functional modulator of enhancer activity. Enhancer-gene mapping and eQTLs implicated BLK and FAM167A as targets. The first systematic G×G investigation in BE/EAC, this study uncovers differential risk associations for CDKN2B variation by BLK genotype, suggesting novel biological dependency between two risk loci encoding key mediators of tumor suppression and inflammation.
format Article
id doaj-art-06e1f892d08e46b4ad7ab6fabb2ed584
institution Kabale University
issn 2666-2477
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series HGG Advances
spelling doaj-art-06e1f892d08e46b4ad7ab6fabb2ed5842025-01-30T05:15:00ZengElsevierHGG Advances2666-24772025-04-0162100399Biologically targeted discovery-replication scan identifies G×G interaction in relation to risk of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinomaLi Yan0Qianchuan He1Shiv P. Verma2Xu Zhang3Ann-Sophie Giel4Carlo Maj5Kathryn Graz6Elnaz Naderi7Jianhong Chen8Mourad Wagdy Ali9Puya Gharahkhani10Xiang Shu11Kenneth Offit12Pari M. Shah13Hans Gerdes14Daniela Molena15Amitabh Srivastava16Stuart MacGregor17Claire Palles18René Thieme19Michael Vieth20Ines Gockel21Thomas L. Vaughan22Johannes Schumacher23Matthew F. Buas24Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USAPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USADepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USADepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USACenter for Human Genetics, University Hospital of Marburg, Marburg, GermanyCenter for Human Genetics, University Hospital of Marburg, Marburg, GermanyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USADepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USADepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USADepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USAQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAClinical Genetics, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAGastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAGastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USADepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaDepartment of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKDepartment of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universiät Erlangen-Nürnberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, GermanyDepartment of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USACenter for Human Genetics, University Hospital of Marburg, Marburg, GermanyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Corresponding authorSummary: Inherited genetics represents an important contributor to risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and its precursor Barrett’s esophagus (BE). Genome-wide association studies have identified ∼30 susceptibility variants for BE/EAC, yet genetic interactions remain unexamined. To address challenges in large-scale G×G scans, we combined knowledge-guided filtering and machine learning approaches, focusing on genes with (1) known/plausible links to BE/EAC pathogenesis (n = 493) or (2) prior evidence of biological interactions (n = 4,196). Approximately 75 × 106 SNP×SNP interactions were screened via hierarchical group lasso (glinternet) using BEACON GWAS data. The top ∼2,000 interactions retained in each scan were prioritized using p values from single logistic models. Identical scans were repeated among males only (78%), with two independent GWAS datasets used for replication. In overall and male-specific primary replications, 11 of 187 and 20 of 191 interactions satisfied p < 0.05, respectively. The strongest evidence for secondary replication was for rs17744726×rs3217992 among males, with consistent directionality across all cohorts (Pmeta = 2.19 × 10−8); rs3217992 “T” was associated with reduced risk only in individuals homozygous for rs17744726 “G.” Rs3217992 maps to the CDKN2B 3′ UTR and reportedly disrupts microRNA-mediated repression. Rs17744726 maps to an intronic enhancer region in BLK. Through in silico prioritization and experimental validation, we identified a nearby proxy variant (rs4841556) as a functional modulator of enhancer activity. Enhancer-gene mapping and eQTLs implicated BLK and FAM167A as targets. The first systematic G×G investigation in BE/EAC, this study uncovers differential risk associations for CDKN2B variation by BLK genotype, suggesting novel biological dependency between two risk loci encoding key mediators of tumor suppression and inflammation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666247725000028gene-gene interactionpost-GWASknowledge-guided filteringmachine learninglarge scale computingBarrett’s esophagus
spellingShingle Li Yan
Qianchuan He
Shiv P. Verma
Xu Zhang
Ann-Sophie Giel
Carlo Maj
Kathryn Graz
Elnaz Naderi
Jianhong Chen
Mourad Wagdy Ali
Puya Gharahkhani
Xiang Shu
Kenneth Offit
Pari M. Shah
Hans Gerdes
Daniela Molena
Amitabh Srivastava
Stuart MacGregor
Claire Palles
René Thieme
Michael Vieth
Ines Gockel
Thomas L. Vaughan
Johannes Schumacher
Matthew F. Buas
Biologically targeted discovery-replication scan identifies G×G interaction in relation to risk of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma
HGG Advances
gene-gene interaction
post-GWAS
knowledge-guided filtering
machine learning
large scale computing
Barrett’s esophagus
title Biologically targeted discovery-replication scan identifies G×G interaction in relation to risk of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full Biologically targeted discovery-replication scan identifies G×G interaction in relation to risk of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Biologically targeted discovery-replication scan identifies G×G interaction in relation to risk of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Biologically targeted discovery-replication scan identifies G×G interaction in relation to risk of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma
title_short Biologically targeted discovery-replication scan identifies G×G interaction in relation to risk of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma
title_sort biologically targeted discovery replication scan identifies g g interaction in relation to risk of barrett s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma
topic gene-gene interaction
post-GWAS
knowledge-guided filtering
machine learning
large scale computing
Barrett’s esophagus
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666247725000028
work_keys_str_mv AT liyan biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT qianchuanhe biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT shivpverma biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT xuzhang biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT annsophiegiel biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT carlomaj biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT kathryngraz biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT elnaznaderi biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT jianhongchen biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT mouradwagdyali biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT puyagharahkhani biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT xiangshu biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT kennethoffit biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT parimshah biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT hansgerdes biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT danielamolena biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT amitabhsrivastava biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT stuartmacgregor biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT clairepalles biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT renethieme biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT michaelvieth biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT inesgockel biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT thomaslvaughan biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT johannesschumacher biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT matthewfbuas biologicallytargeteddiscoveryreplicationscanidentifiesgginteractioninrelationtoriskofbarrettsesophagusandesophagealadenocarcinoma