Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Fractional Flow Reserve versus Quantitative Flow Ratio for Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses
Background. Use of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) technique is recommended to evaluate coronary stenosis severity and guide revascularization. However, its high cost, time to administer, and the side effects of adenosine reduce its clinical utility. Two novel adenosine-free indices, contrast-FFR...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Ruitao Zhang, Jianwei Zhang, Lijun Guo |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7352150 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Numerical Simulation of Dispersed Particle-Blood Flow in the Stenosed Coronary Arteries
by: Mongkol Kaewbumrung, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Simulation of Pulsatile Flow of Blood in Stenosed Coronary Artery Bypass with Graft
by: B. Wiwatanapataphee, et al.
Published: (2006-01-01) -
Enhancing cardiac assessments: accurate and efficient prediction of quantitative fractional flow reserve
by: Arshia Eskandari, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Resting Full-Cycle Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve: A SWEDEHEART-Registry-Based Comparison of Two Physiological Indexes for Assessing Coronary Stenosis Severity
by: Stephen Malmberg, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Fractional flow reserve: current status
by: A.V. Khokhlov, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)