Les régions, porteuses de nouveaux compromis pour l’agriculture ?

While the Common agricultural policy is deeply questioned, the rooms for manoeuvre of the regions are increasingly strengthened. Without any European stable compromise which answers to new social demands, do they are taken into account into regional policies, resulting from new compromises for agric...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aurélie Trouvé
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Recherche & Régulation 2009-06-01
Series:Revue de la Régulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/7550
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832577868981338112
author Aurélie Trouvé
author_facet Aurélie Trouvé
author_sort Aurélie Trouvé
collection DOAJ
description While the Common agricultural policy is deeply questioned, the rooms for manoeuvre of the regions are increasingly strengthened. Without any European stable compromise which answers to new social demands, do they are taken into account into regional policies, resulting from new compromises for agriculture ? To test this idea, power relations are analysed between three main types of divergent interests : neo-mercantilist, neo-liberal and multifunctional ones. Surveys on the field were realized in eight British, French and German regions. They show that the regionalisation leads to the institutionnalisation of different regional compromises. However, it seems to mainly reproduce the dominant power relations at the European level, the persistence of neomercantil interests, the hegemony of the neo-liberal ones and the lack of consideration of the multifonctional ones.
format Article
id doaj-art-068087dcc8944cbeaeb43b2659e8f0a2
institution Kabale University
issn 1957-7796
language English
publishDate 2009-06-01
publisher Association Recherche & Régulation
record_format Article
series Revue de la Régulation
spelling doaj-art-068087dcc8944cbeaeb43b2659e8f0a22025-01-30T14:27:16ZengAssociation Recherche & RégulationRevue de la Régulation1957-77962009-06-01510.4000/regulation.7550Les régions, porteuses de nouveaux compromis pour l’agriculture ?Aurélie TrouvéWhile the Common agricultural policy is deeply questioned, the rooms for manoeuvre of the regions are increasingly strengthened. Without any European stable compromise which answers to new social demands, do they are taken into account into regional policies, resulting from new compromises for agriculture ? To test this idea, power relations are analysed between three main types of divergent interests : neo-mercantilist, neo-liberal and multifunctional ones. Surveys on the field were realized in eight British, French and German regions. They show that the regionalisation leads to the institutionnalisation of different regional compromises. However, it seems to mainly reproduce the dominant power relations at the European level, the persistence of neomercantil interests, the hegemony of the neo-liberal ones and the lack of consideration of the multifonctional ones.https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/7550Agricultural policiesEuropean RegionsRegulation Theory
spellingShingle Aurélie Trouvé
Les régions, porteuses de nouveaux compromis pour l’agriculture ?
Revue de la Régulation
Agricultural policies
European Regions
Regulation Theory
title Les régions, porteuses de nouveaux compromis pour l’agriculture ?
title_full Les régions, porteuses de nouveaux compromis pour l’agriculture ?
title_fullStr Les régions, porteuses de nouveaux compromis pour l’agriculture ?
title_full_unstemmed Les régions, porteuses de nouveaux compromis pour l’agriculture ?
title_short Les régions, porteuses de nouveaux compromis pour l’agriculture ?
title_sort les regions porteuses de nouveaux compromis pour l agriculture
topic Agricultural policies
European Regions
Regulation Theory
url https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/7550
work_keys_str_mv AT aurelietrouve lesregionsporteusesdenouveauxcompromispourlagriculture