The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review.
<h4>Background</h4>Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) focuses on the value of patient outcomes and is achieved by ensuring resources already available are managed to realise the best possible individual and population health outcomes. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) measure the impa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290976&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832540086297690112 |
|---|---|
| author | Mayara Silveira Bianchim Ellie Crane Anwen Jones Barbara Neukirchinger Gareth Roberts Leah Mclaughlin Jane Noyes |
| author_facet | Mayara Silveira Bianchim Ellie Crane Anwen Jones Barbara Neukirchinger Gareth Roberts Leah Mclaughlin Jane Noyes |
| author_sort | Mayara Silveira Bianchim |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) focuses on the value of patient outcomes and is achieved by ensuring resources already available are managed to realise the best possible individual and population health outcomes. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) measure the impact of illnesses from the patient perspective. We conducted a scoping review to understand how PROMs were implemented and used, and their impact in the context of VBHC.<h4>Methods</h4>Arksey and O'Malley's overarching framework supplemented by principles from mixed-methods Framework Synthesis were used. CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar and reference lists were searched. An a priori data extraction framework was created using the review question and objectives as key domains against which to extract data. Mixed-methods data were organised, integrated and preserved in original format and reported for each domain.<h4>Results</h4>Forty-three studies were included with 60,200 participants. Few studies reported a well-developed programme theory and we found little robust evidence of effect. PROMs were universally considered to have the potential to increase patient satisfaction with treatment and services, enhance patient awareness of symptoms and self-management, and improve health outcomes such as quality of life and global health status. Evidence is currently limited on how PROMs work and how best to optimally implement PROMs to achieve the target outcome. Implementation challenges commonly prevented the realisation of optimal outcomes and patients generally needed better and clearer communication about why PROMs were being given and how they could optimally be used to support their own self-management.<h4>Conclusion</h4>PROMSs have yet to demonstrate their full potential in a VBHC context. Optimal PROMs implementation is poorly understood by clinicians and patients. Future studies should explore different models of PROM implementation and use within VBHC programmes to understand what works best and why for each specific context, condition, and population. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-06728f724a624dbe942daa22b53a4328 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-06728f724a624dbe942daa22b53a43282025-02-05T05:32:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-011812e029097610.1371/journal.pone.0290976The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review.Mayara Silveira BianchimEllie CraneAnwen JonesBarbara NeukirchingerGareth RobertsLeah MclaughlinJane Noyes<h4>Background</h4>Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) focuses on the value of patient outcomes and is achieved by ensuring resources already available are managed to realise the best possible individual and population health outcomes. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) measure the impact of illnesses from the patient perspective. We conducted a scoping review to understand how PROMs were implemented and used, and their impact in the context of VBHC.<h4>Methods</h4>Arksey and O'Malley's overarching framework supplemented by principles from mixed-methods Framework Synthesis were used. CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar and reference lists were searched. An a priori data extraction framework was created using the review question and objectives as key domains against which to extract data. Mixed-methods data were organised, integrated and preserved in original format and reported for each domain.<h4>Results</h4>Forty-three studies were included with 60,200 participants. Few studies reported a well-developed programme theory and we found little robust evidence of effect. PROMs were universally considered to have the potential to increase patient satisfaction with treatment and services, enhance patient awareness of symptoms and self-management, and improve health outcomes such as quality of life and global health status. Evidence is currently limited on how PROMs work and how best to optimally implement PROMs to achieve the target outcome. Implementation challenges commonly prevented the realisation of optimal outcomes and patients generally needed better and clearer communication about why PROMs were being given and how they could optimally be used to support their own self-management.<h4>Conclusion</h4>PROMSs have yet to demonstrate their full potential in a VBHC context. Optimal PROMs implementation is poorly understood by clinicians and patients. Future studies should explore different models of PROM implementation and use within VBHC programmes to understand what works best and why for each specific context, condition, and population.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290976&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Mayara Silveira Bianchim Ellie Crane Anwen Jones Barbara Neukirchinger Gareth Roberts Leah Mclaughlin Jane Noyes The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review. PLoS ONE |
| title | The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review. |
| title_full | The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review. |
| title_fullStr | The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review. |
| title_short | The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review. |
| title_sort | implementation use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value based healthcare programmes a scoping review |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290976&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mayarasilveirabianchim theimplementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT elliecrane theimplementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT anwenjones theimplementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT barbaraneukirchinger theimplementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT garethroberts theimplementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT leahmclaughlin theimplementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT janenoyes theimplementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT mayarasilveirabianchim implementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT elliecrane implementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT anwenjones implementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT barbaraneukirchinger implementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT garethroberts implementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT leahmclaughlin implementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview AT janenoyes implementationuseandimpactofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammesascopingreview |