Midterm Clinical Impacts of Biodegradable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared with Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A 3-Year Propensity-Matched Study

Objectives. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in midterm. Background. There are few data about midterm clinical outcomes of BP-EES compared with DP-EES. Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiroaki Matsuda, Ai Kagase, Takahiro Tokuda, Yusuke Ochiumi, Akira Murata, Yoriyasu Suzuki, Tatsuya Ito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2869303
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558428107571200
author Hiroaki Matsuda
Ai Kagase
Takahiro Tokuda
Yusuke Ochiumi
Akira Murata
Yoriyasu Suzuki
Tatsuya Ito
author_facet Hiroaki Matsuda
Ai Kagase
Takahiro Tokuda
Yusuke Ochiumi
Akira Murata
Yoriyasu Suzuki
Tatsuya Ito
author_sort Hiroaki Matsuda
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in midterm. Background. There are few data about midterm clinical outcomes of BP-EES compared with DP-EES. Methods and Results. Between January 2016 and December 2017, 395 consecutive patients were treated with BP-EES and 391 consecutive patients were treated with DP-EES in Nagoya Heart Center. The primary endpoint was a 3-year cumulative incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and clinical indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR). Moreover, clinical indicated target vessel revascularization (TVR) and definite stent thrombosis (ST) were also evaluated as the secondary endpoints. After propensity score matching, 327 patients were selected in each group. At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of TLF was 4.5% in the BP-EES group versus 6.5% in DP-EES (adjusted HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.33–1.30), log-rank P=0.23). Regarding the individual components of the TLF at 3 years, the cumulative incidence of target vessel MI was significantly lower in BP-EES than in DP-EES (0% versus 1.9%: adjusted HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.71–0.97), log-rank P=0.01), but there was no difference between BP-EES and DP-EES in the incidence of cardiac death and clinically indicated TLR. The cumulative 3-year incidence of definite ST was significantly lower in BP-EES than in DP-EES (0% versus 1.6%, log-rank P=0.02). Conclusions. There were no significant differences of TLF between BP-EES and DP-EES within 3 years. In this study, BP-EES seems to prevent definite ST and be safer than DP-EES in midterm.
format Article
id doaj-art-05e872e42c4a410ab2a652f27ca60378
institution Kabale University
issn 0896-4327
1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-05e872e42c4a410ab2a652f27ca603782025-02-03T01:32:22ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832020-01-01202010.1155/2020/28693032869303Midterm Clinical Impacts of Biodegradable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared with Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A 3-Year Propensity-Matched StudyHiroaki Matsuda0Ai Kagase1Takahiro Tokuda2Yusuke Ochiumi3Akira Murata4Yoriyasu Suzuki5Tatsuya Ito6Department of Cardiology, Nagoya Heart Center, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya Heart Center, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya Heart Center, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya Heart Center, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya Heart Center, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya Heart Center, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya Heart Center, Nagoya, JapanObjectives. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in midterm. Background. There are few data about midterm clinical outcomes of BP-EES compared with DP-EES. Methods and Results. Between January 2016 and December 2017, 395 consecutive patients were treated with BP-EES and 391 consecutive patients were treated with DP-EES in Nagoya Heart Center. The primary endpoint was a 3-year cumulative incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and clinical indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR). Moreover, clinical indicated target vessel revascularization (TVR) and definite stent thrombosis (ST) were also evaluated as the secondary endpoints. After propensity score matching, 327 patients were selected in each group. At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of TLF was 4.5% in the BP-EES group versus 6.5% in DP-EES (adjusted HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.33–1.30), log-rank P=0.23). Regarding the individual components of the TLF at 3 years, the cumulative incidence of target vessel MI was significantly lower in BP-EES than in DP-EES (0% versus 1.9%: adjusted HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.71–0.97), log-rank P=0.01), but there was no difference between BP-EES and DP-EES in the incidence of cardiac death and clinically indicated TLR. The cumulative 3-year incidence of definite ST was significantly lower in BP-EES than in DP-EES (0% versus 1.6%, log-rank P=0.02). Conclusions. There were no significant differences of TLF between BP-EES and DP-EES within 3 years. In this study, BP-EES seems to prevent definite ST and be safer than DP-EES in midterm.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2869303
spellingShingle Hiroaki Matsuda
Ai Kagase
Takahiro Tokuda
Yusuke Ochiumi
Akira Murata
Yoriyasu Suzuki
Tatsuya Ito
Midterm Clinical Impacts of Biodegradable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared with Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A 3-Year Propensity-Matched Study
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Midterm Clinical Impacts of Biodegradable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared with Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A 3-Year Propensity-Matched Study
title_full Midterm Clinical Impacts of Biodegradable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared with Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A 3-Year Propensity-Matched Study
title_fullStr Midterm Clinical Impacts of Biodegradable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared with Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A 3-Year Propensity-Matched Study
title_full_unstemmed Midterm Clinical Impacts of Biodegradable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared with Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A 3-Year Propensity-Matched Study
title_short Midterm Clinical Impacts of Biodegradable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared with Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A 3-Year Propensity-Matched Study
title_sort midterm clinical impacts of biodegradable polymer everolimus eluting stents compared with durable polymer everolimus eluting stents a 3 year propensity matched study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2869303
work_keys_str_mv AT hiroakimatsuda midtermclinicalimpactsofbiodegradablepolymereverolimuselutingstentscomparedwithdurablepolymereverolimuselutingstentsa3yearpropensitymatchedstudy
AT aikagase midtermclinicalimpactsofbiodegradablepolymereverolimuselutingstentscomparedwithdurablepolymereverolimuselutingstentsa3yearpropensitymatchedstudy
AT takahirotokuda midtermclinicalimpactsofbiodegradablepolymereverolimuselutingstentscomparedwithdurablepolymereverolimuselutingstentsa3yearpropensitymatchedstudy
AT yusukeochiumi midtermclinicalimpactsofbiodegradablepolymereverolimuselutingstentscomparedwithdurablepolymereverolimuselutingstentsa3yearpropensitymatchedstudy
AT akiramurata midtermclinicalimpactsofbiodegradablepolymereverolimuselutingstentscomparedwithdurablepolymereverolimuselutingstentsa3yearpropensitymatchedstudy
AT yoriyasusuzuki midtermclinicalimpactsofbiodegradablepolymereverolimuselutingstentscomparedwithdurablepolymereverolimuselutingstentsa3yearpropensitymatchedstudy
AT tatsuyaito midtermclinicalimpactsofbiodegradablepolymereverolimuselutingstentscomparedwithdurablepolymereverolimuselutingstentsa3yearpropensitymatchedstudy