A cross-study analysis of the effect of a dual-strain probiotic applied via the waterline on the growth performance and gut health of broilers under a mild necrotic enteritis challenge

Probiotics offer potential as an approach for the prevention and control of poultry intestinal diseases, but external factors can influence the birds’ response. Combining data from multiple trials provides greater confidence around efficacy under varying production conditions. Therefore, this study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S.A.S. van der Klein, M. Bernardeau, Q. Wang, K. Gibbs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Poultry Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579124011283
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591816418918400
author S.A.S. van der Klein
M. Bernardeau
Q. Wang
K. Gibbs
author_facet S.A.S. van der Klein
M. Bernardeau
Q. Wang
K. Gibbs
author_sort S.A.S. van der Klein
collection DOAJ
description Probiotics offer potential as an approach for the prevention and control of poultry intestinal diseases, but external factors can influence the birds’ response. Combining data from multiple trials provides greater confidence around efficacy under varying production conditions. Therefore, this study combined data from three separate trials analyzing the effect of a dual-strain probiotic comprising Lactobacillus acidophilus AG01 and Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis AG02 on broilers during a mild necrotic enteritis (NE) challenge. In each, 1,440 broilers were assigned to floor-pens (40 birds/pen, 12 pens/treatment) in a completely randomized design. Treatments in each trial were a non-challenged control (C); challenged control (10 x dose of Eimeria/bird on d 14 and 1.0 x ∼109 colony forming units (CFU)/bird of C. perfringens on d 16-20; CC); and CC supplemented daily via the waterline with 1 × 109 CFU/bird of probiotic (CC+Probiotic). Birds were fed corn-soybean mealbased diets by phase (starter: 0 to 14, grower: 15 to 28, finisher: 29 to 42 d of age) ad libitum. Growth performance was monitored over 42 d, NE lesion scoring performed on d 21 and 28 in all trials, and, in Trial 3 only, cecal microbiota composition was analyzed on d 28. From d 1 to 42, CC birds exhibited reduced BW, BW gain (BWG), and feed intake (FI) (-9.2 %, -9.5 %, -5.0 %, respectively; P < 0.05), increased FCR and mortality (+8.5 points and 1.3 % points, respectively; P < 0.05) compared to C, and increased NE induction on d 28 (67.8 vs. 9.4 %, P <0.05). Compared to CC, CC+Probiotic birds exhibited increased BW, BWG and FI (d 42: +6.9 %, +7.1 %, +4.0 %; P < 0.05) and reduced FCR, mortality and d 28 NE lesion scores (-0.5 points, -1.4 % points and -57.1 %, respectively; P < 0.05). The composition of the cecal microbiota of CC+Probiotic birds at 28 d of age exhibited higher abundance of butyrogenic bacterial genera in Trial 3, which may have contributed to the beneficial effects of the probiotic. The results demonstrate that the probiotic ameliorated the negative effects of a mild NE-challenge on growth performance and intestinal symptoms over three trials incorporating variation in season and bird breed.
format Article
id doaj-art-05183096efd94ffb9da19d887ed42571
institution Kabale University
issn 0032-5791
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Poultry Science
spelling doaj-art-05183096efd94ffb9da19d887ed425712025-01-22T05:40:26ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912025-01-011041104550A cross-study analysis of the effect of a dual-strain probiotic applied via the waterline on the growth performance and gut health of broilers under a mild necrotic enteritis challengeS.A.S. van der Klein0M. Bernardeau1Q. Wang2K. Gibbs3Danisco Animal Nutrition &amp; Health, IFF, Willem Einthovenstraat 4 2342 BG, Oegstgeest, The Netherlands; Corresponding authorNormandy University, UNICAEN, ABTE 14000, Caen, FranceHealth &amp; Biosciences, IFF, Wilmington, Delaware, USADanisco Animal Nutrition &amp; Health, IFF, Willem Einthovenstraat 4 2342 BG, Oegstgeest, The NetherlandsProbiotics offer potential as an approach for the prevention and control of poultry intestinal diseases, but external factors can influence the birds’ response. Combining data from multiple trials provides greater confidence around efficacy under varying production conditions. Therefore, this study combined data from three separate trials analyzing the effect of a dual-strain probiotic comprising Lactobacillus acidophilus AG01 and Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis AG02 on broilers during a mild necrotic enteritis (NE) challenge. In each, 1,440 broilers were assigned to floor-pens (40 birds/pen, 12 pens/treatment) in a completely randomized design. Treatments in each trial were a non-challenged control (C); challenged control (10 x dose of Eimeria/bird on d 14 and 1.0 x ∼109 colony forming units (CFU)/bird of C. perfringens on d 16-20; CC); and CC supplemented daily via the waterline with 1 × 109 CFU/bird of probiotic (CC+Probiotic). Birds were fed corn-soybean mealbased diets by phase (starter: 0 to 14, grower: 15 to 28, finisher: 29 to 42 d of age) ad libitum. Growth performance was monitored over 42 d, NE lesion scoring performed on d 21 and 28 in all trials, and, in Trial 3 only, cecal microbiota composition was analyzed on d 28. From d 1 to 42, CC birds exhibited reduced BW, BW gain (BWG), and feed intake (FI) (-9.2 %, -9.5 %, -5.0 %, respectively; P < 0.05), increased FCR and mortality (+8.5 points and 1.3 % points, respectively; P < 0.05) compared to C, and increased NE induction on d 28 (67.8 vs. 9.4 %, P <0.05). Compared to CC, CC+Probiotic birds exhibited increased BW, BWG and FI (d 42: +6.9 %, +7.1 %, +4.0 %; P < 0.05) and reduced FCR, mortality and d 28 NE lesion scores (-0.5 points, -1.4 % points and -57.1 %, respectively; P < 0.05). The composition of the cecal microbiota of CC+Probiotic birds at 28 d of age exhibited higher abundance of butyrogenic bacterial genera in Trial 3, which may have contributed to the beneficial effects of the probiotic. The results demonstrate that the probiotic ameliorated the negative effects of a mild NE-challenge on growth performance and intestinal symptoms over three trials incorporating variation in season and bird breed.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579124011283BroilerCoccidiosisMicrobiomeNecrotic enteritisProbiotic
spellingShingle S.A.S. van der Klein
M. Bernardeau
Q. Wang
K. Gibbs
A cross-study analysis of the effect of a dual-strain probiotic applied via the waterline on the growth performance and gut health of broilers under a mild necrotic enteritis challenge
Poultry Science
Broiler
Coccidiosis
Microbiome
Necrotic enteritis
Probiotic
title A cross-study analysis of the effect of a dual-strain probiotic applied via the waterline on the growth performance and gut health of broilers under a mild necrotic enteritis challenge
title_full A cross-study analysis of the effect of a dual-strain probiotic applied via the waterline on the growth performance and gut health of broilers under a mild necrotic enteritis challenge
title_fullStr A cross-study analysis of the effect of a dual-strain probiotic applied via the waterline on the growth performance and gut health of broilers under a mild necrotic enteritis challenge
title_full_unstemmed A cross-study analysis of the effect of a dual-strain probiotic applied via the waterline on the growth performance and gut health of broilers under a mild necrotic enteritis challenge
title_short A cross-study analysis of the effect of a dual-strain probiotic applied via the waterline on the growth performance and gut health of broilers under a mild necrotic enteritis challenge
title_sort cross study analysis of the effect of a dual strain probiotic applied via the waterline on the growth performance and gut health of broilers under a mild necrotic enteritis challenge
topic Broiler
Coccidiosis
Microbiome
Necrotic enteritis
Probiotic
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579124011283
work_keys_str_mv AT sasvanderklein acrossstudyanalysisoftheeffectofadualstrainprobioticappliedviathewaterlineonthegrowthperformanceandguthealthofbroilersunderamildnecroticenteritischallenge
AT mbernardeau acrossstudyanalysisoftheeffectofadualstrainprobioticappliedviathewaterlineonthegrowthperformanceandguthealthofbroilersunderamildnecroticenteritischallenge
AT qwang acrossstudyanalysisoftheeffectofadualstrainprobioticappliedviathewaterlineonthegrowthperformanceandguthealthofbroilersunderamildnecroticenteritischallenge
AT kgibbs acrossstudyanalysisoftheeffectofadualstrainprobioticappliedviathewaterlineonthegrowthperformanceandguthealthofbroilersunderamildnecroticenteritischallenge
AT sasvanderklein crossstudyanalysisoftheeffectofadualstrainprobioticappliedviathewaterlineonthegrowthperformanceandguthealthofbroilersunderamildnecroticenteritischallenge
AT mbernardeau crossstudyanalysisoftheeffectofadualstrainprobioticappliedviathewaterlineonthegrowthperformanceandguthealthofbroilersunderamildnecroticenteritischallenge
AT qwang crossstudyanalysisoftheeffectofadualstrainprobioticappliedviathewaterlineonthegrowthperformanceandguthealthofbroilersunderamildnecroticenteritischallenge
AT kgibbs crossstudyanalysisoftheeffectofadualstrainprobioticappliedviathewaterlineonthegrowthperformanceandguthealthofbroilersunderamildnecroticenteritischallenge