Effect of Mitomycin C on Myopic versus Astigmatic Photorefractive Keratectomy

Purpose. Long-term mitomycin C (MMC) effects on photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) were compared in simple myopic and astigmatic patients. Methods. In this observational cohort study, subjects were selected based on preoperative and postoperative data collected from medical records; they were divided...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashwag A. Almosa, Samah M. Fawzy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2841408
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558287938125824
author Ashwag A. Almosa
Samah M. Fawzy
author_facet Ashwag A. Almosa
Samah M. Fawzy
author_sort Ashwag A. Almosa
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. Long-term mitomycin C (MMC) effects on photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) were compared in simple myopic and astigmatic patients. Methods. In this observational cohort study, subjects were selected based on preoperative and postoperative data collected from medical records; they were divided into simple myopia with/without MMC and myopic astigmatism with/without MMC groups. Haze, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, and K-reading were evaluated at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. Results. One hundred fifty-nine eyes of 80 subjects (34 women and 46 men; mean age, 26.81 ± 7.74 years; range, 18–53 years; spherical powers, −0.50 to −8.00 DS; and cylindrical powers, −0.25 to −5.00 DC) were enrolled. One year postoperatively, the simple myopia with/without MMC groups showed no difference in UCVA (P=0.187), BCVA (P=0.163), or spherical equivalent (P=0.163) and a significant difference (P=0.0495) in K-reading; the haze formation difference was nonsignificant (P=0.056). Astigmatic groups with/without MMC showed a significant difference in K-reading (P<0.0001). MMC groups had less haze formation (P<0.0001). Conclusion. PRK with intraoperative MMC application showed excellent visual outcomes. MMC’s effect on astigmatic patients was significantly better with acceptable safety and minimal side effects.
format Article
id doaj-art-04e33b84b4c44b098ae6cbb770228f08
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-04e33b84b4c44b098ae6cbb770228f082025-02-03T01:32:36ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582017-01-01201710.1155/2017/28414082841408Effect of Mitomycin C on Myopic versus Astigmatic Photorefractive KeratectomyAshwag A. Almosa0Samah M. Fawzy1College of Applied Medical Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi ArabiaFaculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Ramses St., Abbasia, Cairo 191566, EgyptPurpose. Long-term mitomycin C (MMC) effects on photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) were compared in simple myopic and astigmatic patients. Methods. In this observational cohort study, subjects were selected based on preoperative and postoperative data collected from medical records; they were divided into simple myopia with/without MMC and myopic astigmatism with/without MMC groups. Haze, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, and K-reading were evaluated at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. Results. One hundred fifty-nine eyes of 80 subjects (34 women and 46 men; mean age, 26.81 ± 7.74 years; range, 18–53 years; spherical powers, −0.50 to −8.00 DS; and cylindrical powers, −0.25 to −5.00 DC) were enrolled. One year postoperatively, the simple myopia with/without MMC groups showed no difference in UCVA (P=0.187), BCVA (P=0.163), or spherical equivalent (P=0.163) and a significant difference (P=0.0495) in K-reading; the haze formation difference was nonsignificant (P=0.056). Astigmatic groups with/without MMC showed a significant difference in K-reading (P<0.0001). MMC groups had less haze formation (P<0.0001). Conclusion. PRK with intraoperative MMC application showed excellent visual outcomes. MMC’s effect on astigmatic patients was significantly better with acceptable safety and minimal side effects.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2841408
spellingShingle Ashwag A. Almosa
Samah M. Fawzy
Effect of Mitomycin C on Myopic versus Astigmatic Photorefractive Keratectomy
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Effect of Mitomycin C on Myopic versus Astigmatic Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full Effect of Mitomycin C on Myopic versus Astigmatic Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_fullStr Effect of Mitomycin C on Myopic versus Astigmatic Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Mitomycin C on Myopic versus Astigmatic Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_short Effect of Mitomycin C on Myopic versus Astigmatic Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_sort effect of mitomycin c on myopic versus astigmatic photorefractive keratectomy
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2841408
work_keys_str_mv AT ashwagaalmosa effectofmitomycinconmyopicversusastigmaticphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT samahmfawzy effectofmitomycinconmyopicversusastigmaticphotorefractivekeratectomy