Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives

Access to contraception is an essential component of reproductive autonomy. Abortion restrictions such as those introduced in some states following the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision have spillover effects on broader sexual and reproductive health service provision, such as contraceptive servic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alicia VandeVusse, Jennifer Mueller, Octavia Mulhern, Sidney Cech
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:SSM: Qualitative Research in Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000101
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583830472491008
author Alicia VandeVusse
Jennifer Mueller
Octavia Mulhern
Sidney Cech
author_facet Alicia VandeVusse
Jennifer Mueller
Octavia Mulhern
Sidney Cech
author_sort Alicia VandeVusse
collection DOAJ
description Access to contraception is an essential component of reproductive autonomy. Abortion restrictions such as those introduced in some states following the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision have spillover effects on broader sexual and reproductive health service provision, such as contraceptive services. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with key staff at publicly supported clinics providing contraceptive services in the United States, examining their experiences of changes in the delivery of family planning services in states where abortion policies are severely restrictive and states where they are less restrictive or protective. We found that publicly supported family planning clinics have experienced some limited impacts on contraceptive care and contraceptive demand due to the Dobbs decision and resultant abortion bans. Clinics in both restrictive and less restrictive/protective states report continuing to provide high-quality contraceptive care post-Dobbs, but they have also changed certain contraceptive counseling practices, grappled with changes in contraceptive demand, and taken steps to adjust their clinic workflows to mitigate the effects of Dobbs. Abortion restrictions impact the provision of contraceptive services. More research is needed to continue to document the spillover effects of abortion restrictions, along with the impact of restrictions on the quality of contraceptive care.
format Article
id doaj-art-03fa092b615744fa848c45b5953be8c1
institution Kabale University
issn 2667-3215
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series SSM: Qualitative Research in Health
spelling doaj-art-03fa092b615744fa848c45b5953be8c12025-01-28T04:14:59ZengElsevierSSM: Qualitative Research in Health2667-32152025-06-017100532Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectivesAlicia VandeVusse0Jennifer Mueller1Octavia Mulhern2Sidney Cech3Corresponding author.; Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10038, USAGuttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10038, USAGuttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10038, USAGuttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10038, USAAccess to contraception is an essential component of reproductive autonomy. Abortion restrictions such as those introduced in some states following the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision have spillover effects on broader sexual and reproductive health service provision, such as contraceptive services. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with key staff at publicly supported clinics providing contraceptive services in the United States, examining their experiences of changes in the delivery of family planning services in states where abortion policies are severely restrictive and states where they are less restrictive or protective. We found that publicly supported family planning clinics have experienced some limited impacts on contraceptive care and contraceptive demand due to the Dobbs decision and resultant abortion bans. Clinics in both restrictive and less restrictive/protective states report continuing to provide high-quality contraceptive care post-Dobbs, but they have also changed certain contraceptive counseling practices, grappled with changes in contraceptive demand, and taken steps to adjust their clinic workflows to mitigate the effects of Dobbs. Abortion restrictions impact the provision of contraceptive services. More research is needed to continue to document the spillover effects of abortion restrictions, along with the impact of restrictions on the quality of contraceptive care.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000101ContraceptionHealth service provisionAbortion restrictions
spellingShingle Alicia VandeVusse
Jennifer Mueller
Octavia Mulhern
Sidney Cech
Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives
SSM: Qualitative Research in Health
Contraception
Health service provision
Abortion restrictions
title Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives
title_full Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives
title_fullStr Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives
title_short Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives
title_sort contraceptive care post dobbs a qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives
topic Contraception
Health service provision
Abortion restrictions
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000101
work_keys_str_mv AT aliciavandevusse contraceptivecarepostdobbsaqualitativestudyofclinicstaffperspectives
AT jennifermueller contraceptivecarepostdobbsaqualitativestudyofclinicstaffperspectives
AT octaviamulhern contraceptivecarepostdobbsaqualitativestudyofclinicstaffperspectives
AT sidneycech contraceptivecarepostdobbsaqualitativestudyofclinicstaffperspectives