Assessment tuberculin skin test specificity in water buffalo using five different antigens

Tuberculosis (TB) control involves “test and cull strategies”. The primary diagnostic test is the tuberculin skin test (TST) which requires intradermal inoculation with specific My cobacterium bovis antigens, bovine tuberculin (PPDB) in the single intradermal reaction test (SIT) and avian tuberculi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandra Martucciello, Francesco Napolitano, Piera Mazzone, Francesco Grandoni, Maria Beatrice Boniotti, Monica Cagiola, Gabriele Di Vuolo, Felice Gerardo Giglio, Francesco Grippa, Giorgio Galiero, Federica Signorelli, Esterina De Carlo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad del Zulia 2023-11-01
Series:Revista Científica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cientifica/article/view/43392
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832577715749781504
author Alessandra Martucciello
Francesco Napolitano
Piera Mazzone
Francesco Grandoni
Maria Beatrice Boniotti
Monica Cagiola
Gabriele Di Vuolo
Felice Gerardo Giglio
Francesco Grippa
Giorgio Galiero
Federica Signorelli
Esterina De Carlo
author_facet Alessandra Martucciello
Francesco Napolitano
Piera Mazzone
Francesco Grandoni
Maria Beatrice Boniotti
Monica Cagiola
Gabriele Di Vuolo
Felice Gerardo Giglio
Francesco Grippa
Giorgio Galiero
Federica Signorelli
Esterina De Carlo
author_sort Alessandra Martucciello
collection DOAJ
description Tuberculosis (TB) control involves “test and cull strategies”. The primary diagnostic test is the tuberculin skin test (TST) which requires intradermal inoculation with specific My cobacterium bovis antigens, bovine tuberculin (PPDB) in the single intradermal reaction test (SIT) and avian tuberculin (PPDA) in the comparative intradermal reaction test (SICT). Using other antigens susch as 6 kDa early secretory antigenic target (ESAT-6), 10 kDa culture filtrate protein (CFP-10) and Early Secretory Proteins (ESP) could increase test specificity. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the specificity of TST using five different antigens. A total of 100 buffaloes from 3 TB free Italian herds were enrolled. Five intradermal injection sites on the animal’s shoulder (three on the right and two on the left side) were used on each animal, with a volume of 0.1 mL for all antigens (ESAT-6 and CFP-10 at 20 μg/mL, ESP at 100 μg/mL, PPDA and PPDB at 100 μg/mL), and PBS as negative control. Skin reactions were measured using calipers. Results were expressed in millimeters as the difference between the two measurements, i.e., before and 72h after the inoculation of tuberculin. The reaction was considered positive if skin thickness increased by ≥ 4mm, doubtful if >2 and <4mm, and negative if ≤ 2 mm. All 100 buffaloes were also submitted to the gamma-interferon (IFN-γ) test to confirm TB negativity. Of the 100 negative subjects, 31 gave doubtful SIT results to PPDB while the number of doubtful subjects decreased to 11 with the SICT. The number of doubtful results with ESP stimulation was 26 and with the ESAT-6 and CFP-10 protein cocktail, it was 21. If we introduce the responses to stimulation with ESP and ESAT-6 and CFP-10 protein cocktail combined with the interpretation of SICT, the 11 doubtful results would be reduced to 5 and 4, respectively. The doubtful outcomes of SIT and SICT found in negative animals with PPDB and PPDA stimulation, could be due to non-specific responses. In buffalo, this non-specificity could be due to atypical mycobacterial infections as well as to the peculiarities of buffalo skin structure compared to bovine skin (e.g., dermis thickness). Regarding ESAT-6 and CFP-10 protein cocktail and ESP, they induced fewer non-specific reactions, and thus, they could be used in SICT in association with traditional PPDs. Due to the IFN-γ test, we excluded the presence of anergic subjects, since all 100 subjects reacted to stimulus with the mitogen. Furthermore, the IFN-γ test in the same animals gave negative results according to the interpretation criteria of the official EU IFN-γ test, even if with slight non-specific reactions, but excluding false-positive results.
format Article
id doaj-art-03e0e864187d4e48a061ae121ff791b4
institution Kabale University
issn 0798-2259
2521-9715
language English
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Universidad del Zulia
record_format Article
series Revista Científica
spelling doaj-art-03e0e864187d4e48a061ae121ff791b42025-01-30T15:36:55ZengUniversidad del ZuliaRevista Científica0798-22592521-97152023-11-0133Suplemento10.52973/rcfcv-wbc086Assessment tuberculin skin test specificity in water buffalo using five different antigensAlessandra Martucciello 0Francesco Napolitano1Piera Mazzone2Francesco Grandoni 3Maria Beatrice Boniotti4Monica Cagiola5Gabriele Di Vuolo6Felice Gerardo Giglio 7Francesco Grippa 8Giorgio Galiero 9Federica Signorelli10Esterina De Carlo11National Reference Centre for Hygiene and Technology of Breeding and Buffalo Production, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Salerno, Italy.National Reference Centre for Hygiene and Technology of Breeding and Buffalo Production, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Salerno, Italy.Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Umbria e delle Marche “Togo Rosati”, Perugia, Italy.Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Animal Production and Aquaculture, Monterotondo, Italy.Tuberculosis, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Umbria e delle Marche “Togo Rosati”, Perugia, Italy.National Reference Centre for Hygiene and Technology of Breeding and Buffalo Production, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Salerno, Italy.Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, Salerno, Italy.Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, Salerno, Italy.National Reference Centre for Hygiene and Technology of Breeding and Buffalo Production, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Salerno, Italy.Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Animal Production and Aquaculture, Monterotondo, Italy.National Reference Centre for Hygiene and Technology of Breeding and Buffalo Production, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Salerno, Italy. Tuberculosis (TB) control involves “test and cull strategies”. The primary diagnostic test is the tuberculin skin test (TST) which requires intradermal inoculation with specific My cobacterium bovis antigens, bovine tuberculin (PPDB) in the single intradermal reaction test (SIT) and avian tuberculin (PPDA) in the comparative intradermal reaction test (SICT). Using other antigens susch as 6 kDa early secretory antigenic target (ESAT-6), 10 kDa culture filtrate protein (CFP-10) and Early Secretory Proteins (ESP) could increase test specificity. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the specificity of TST using five different antigens. A total of 100 buffaloes from 3 TB free Italian herds were enrolled. Five intradermal injection sites on the animal’s shoulder (three on the right and two on the left side) were used on each animal, with a volume of 0.1 mL for all antigens (ESAT-6 and CFP-10 at 20 μg/mL, ESP at 100 μg/mL, PPDA and PPDB at 100 μg/mL), and PBS as negative control. Skin reactions were measured using calipers. Results were expressed in millimeters as the difference between the two measurements, i.e., before and 72h after the inoculation of tuberculin. The reaction was considered positive if skin thickness increased by ≥ 4mm, doubtful if >2 and <4mm, and negative if ≤ 2 mm. All 100 buffaloes were also submitted to the gamma-interferon (IFN-γ) test to confirm TB negativity. Of the 100 negative subjects, 31 gave doubtful SIT results to PPDB while the number of doubtful subjects decreased to 11 with the SICT. The number of doubtful results with ESP stimulation was 26 and with the ESAT-6 and CFP-10 protein cocktail, it was 21. If we introduce the responses to stimulation with ESP and ESAT-6 and CFP-10 protein cocktail combined with the interpretation of SICT, the 11 doubtful results would be reduced to 5 and 4, respectively. The doubtful outcomes of SIT and SICT found in negative animals with PPDB and PPDA stimulation, could be due to non-specific responses. In buffalo, this non-specificity could be due to atypical mycobacterial infections as well as to the peculiarities of buffalo skin structure compared to bovine skin (e.g., dermis thickness). Regarding ESAT-6 and CFP-10 protein cocktail and ESP, they induced fewer non-specific reactions, and thus, they could be used in SICT in association with traditional PPDs. Due to the IFN-γ test, we excluded the presence of anergic subjects, since all 100 subjects reacted to stimulus with the mitogen. Furthermore, the IFN-γ test in the same animals gave negative results according to the interpretation criteria of the official EU IFN-γ test, even if with slight non-specific reactions, but excluding false-positive results. https://www.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cientifica/article/view/43392water buffalotuberculosis diagnosistuberculin skin testspecificity
spellingShingle Alessandra Martucciello
Francesco Napolitano
Piera Mazzone
Francesco Grandoni
Maria Beatrice Boniotti
Monica Cagiola
Gabriele Di Vuolo
Felice Gerardo Giglio
Francesco Grippa
Giorgio Galiero
Federica Signorelli
Esterina De Carlo
Assessment tuberculin skin test specificity in water buffalo using five different antigens
Revista Científica
water buffalo
tuberculosis diagnosis
tuberculin skin test
specificity
title Assessment tuberculin skin test specificity in water buffalo using five different antigens
title_full Assessment tuberculin skin test specificity in water buffalo using five different antigens
title_fullStr Assessment tuberculin skin test specificity in water buffalo using five different antigens
title_full_unstemmed Assessment tuberculin skin test specificity in water buffalo using five different antigens
title_short Assessment tuberculin skin test specificity in water buffalo using five different antigens
title_sort assessment tuberculin skin test specificity in water buffalo using five different antigens
topic water buffalo
tuberculosis diagnosis
tuberculin skin test
specificity
url https://www.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cientifica/article/view/43392
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandramartucciello assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens
AT francesconapolitano assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens
AT pieramazzone assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens
AT francescograndoni assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens
AT mariabeatriceboniotti assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens
AT monicacagiola assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens
AT gabrieledivuolo assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens
AT felicegerardogiglio assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens
AT francescogrippa assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens
AT giorgiogaliero assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens
AT federicasignorelli assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens
AT esterinadecarlo assessmenttuberculinskintestspecificityinwaterbuffalousingfivedifferentantigens