Various biases in systematic review and meta-analysis and their assessment
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesise existing evidence for clinical and scientific decision-making. Clinicians and researchers need to understand how to interpret the evidence with the bias involved, as well as the various available tools and how to use them when performing a systematic r...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Abhijit S. Nair, Nitin K. Borkar |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_1212_24 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
by: Kapil D. Soni
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Utilization of partograph and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Mulat Ayele, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Experimental evidence-based construction of electroacupuncture for ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis and systematic review
by: Yaoguang Guo, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Safety and efficacy of remifentanil in patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries – A systematic review
by: Abhijit S. Nair, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Acupoint stimulation for postpartum breastfeeding insufficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Ya-Ching Chang, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)