Characterization of preclinical models to investigate spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract. Despite advancements in preclinical and clinical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) research, the mechanisms of SCS action remain unclear. This may result from challenges in translatability of findings between species. Our systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023457443) aimed to comprehensively ch...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | PAIN Reports |
| Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001228 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832589606177996800 |
|---|---|
| author | Dave Mugan Quoc C. Vuong Birte E. Dietz Ilona Obara |
| author_facet | Dave Mugan Quoc C. Vuong Birte E. Dietz Ilona Obara |
| author_sort | Dave Mugan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract. Despite advancements in preclinical and clinical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) research, the mechanisms of SCS action remain unclear. This may result from challenges in translatability of findings between species. Our systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023457443) aimed to comprehensively characterize the important translational components of preclinical SCS models, including stimulating elements and stimulation specifications. Databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and WikiStim) were searched on October 5, 2023, identifying 78 studies meeting the search criteria. We conducted a post hoc meta-analysis, including subgroup analyses and meta-regression, to assess SCS efficacy on mechanical hypersensitivity in rats subjected to neuropathic pain. Although monopolar electrodes were predominantly used as stimulating elements until 2013, quadripolar paddle and cylindrical leads gained recent popularity. Most research was conducted using 50 Hz and 200 µs stimulation. Motor threshold (MT) estimation was the predominant strategy to determine SCS intensity, which was set to 71.9% of MT on average. Our analysis revealed a large effect size for SCS (Hedge g = 1.13, 95% CI: [0.93, 1.32]) with similar magnitudes of effect between conventional (≤100 Hz) and nonconventional SCS paradigms while sham SCS had nonsignificant effect size. In addition, different stimulation intensity, frequency, and electrode design did not affect effect size. The risk of bias was assessed using Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation criteria and was unclear, and only the frequency subgroup analysis showed publication bias. In summary, our review characterizes the critical components of preclinical SCS models and provides recommendations to improve reproducibility and translatability, thereby advancing the scientific foundation for SCS research. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-027428caff68428da3678a80e496501d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2471-2531 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PAIN Reports |
| spelling | doaj-art-027428caff68428da3678a80e496501d2025-01-24T09:20:44ZengWolters KluwerPAIN Reports2471-25312025-02-01101e122810.1097/PR9.0000000000001228PR90000000000001228Characterization of preclinical models to investigate spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysisDave Mugan0Quoc C. Vuong1Birte E. Dietz2Ilona Obara3a School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdomd Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdoma School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdoma School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United KingdomAbstract. Despite advancements in preclinical and clinical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) research, the mechanisms of SCS action remain unclear. This may result from challenges in translatability of findings between species. Our systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023457443) aimed to comprehensively characterize the important translational components of preclinical SCS models, including stimulating elements and stimulation specifications. Databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and WikiStim) were searched on October 5, 2023, identifying 78 studies meeting the search criteria. We conducted a post hoc meta-analysis, including subgroup analyses and meta-regression, to assess SCS efficacy on mechanical hypersensitivity in rats subjected to neuropathic pain. Although monopolar electrodes were predominantly used as stimulating elements until 2013, quadripolar paddle and cylindrical leads gained recent popularity. Most research was conducted using 50 Hz and 200 µs stimulation. Motor threshold (MT) estimation was the predominant strategy to determine SCS intensity, which was set to 71.9% of MT on average. Our analysis revealed a large effect size for SCS (Hedge g = 1.13, 95% CI: [0.93, 1.32]) with similar magnitudes of effect between conventional (≤100 Hz) and nonconventional SCS paradigms while sham SCS had nonsignificant effect size. In addition, different stimulation intensity, frequency, and electrode design did not affect effect size. The risk of bias was assessed using Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation criteria and was unclear, and only the frequency subgroup analysis showed publication bias. In summary, our review characterizes the critical components of preclinical SCS models and provides recommendations to improve reproducibility and translatability, thereby advancing the scientific foundation for SCS research.http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001228 |
| spellingShingle | Dave Mugan Quoc C. Vuong Birte E. Dietz Ilona Obara Characterization of preclinical models to investigate spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis PAIN Reports |
| title | Characterization of preclinical models to investigate spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full | Characterization of preclinical models to investigate spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Characterization of preclinical models to investigate spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Characterization of preclinical models to investigate spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_short | Characterization of preclinical models to investigate spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_sort | characterization of preclinical models to investigate spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain a systematic review and meta analysis |
| url | http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001228 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT davemugan characterizationofpreclinicalmodelstoinvestigatespinalcordstimulationforneuropathicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT quoccvuong characterizationofpreclinicalmodelstoinvestigatespinalcordstimulationforneuropathicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT birteedietz characterizationofpreclinicalmodelstoinvestigatespinalcordstimulationforneuropathicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ilonaobara characterizationofpreclinicalmodelstoinvestigatespinalcordstimulationforneuropathicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |