Exploring language learning and corrective feedback in an eTandem project

Many studies about eTandem and language learning stem from learners in Western institutions of higher education. Unfortunately, there is a lack of research investigating the telecollaboration regarding language development between learners in the East and the West. Against this backdrop, a small-sca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tang Jinlan, Qian Kan, Wang Na, Hu Xiaona
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2021-08-01
Series:Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2021-2005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832593659914092544
author Tang Jinlan
Qian Kan
Wang Na
Hu Xiaona
author_facet Tang Jinlan
Qian Kan
Wang Na
Hu Xiaona
author_sort Tang Jinlan
collection DOAJ
description Many studies about eTandem and language learning stem from learners in Western institutions of higher education. Unfortunately, there is a lack of research investigating the telecollaboration regarding language development between learners in the East and the West. Against this backdrop, a small-scale, six-week Chinese-English eTandem project focusing on learners’ language learning processes and experiences was undertaken between nine Chinese university students learning English in China and nine British university students learning Chinese in the UK. Multiple datasets were collected from learners’ diaries, synchronous Skype communication recordings, email exchanges, interviews and a post-project survey. This paper reports the main language error types made by Chinese L2 learners of English and error correction strategies provided by eTandem partners of competent L1 English speakers, along with how Chinese participants responded to the corrections. A thorough analysis of the research data indicated three types of linguistic errors in written tasks made by Chinese L2 learners of English: grammatical, lexical and idiomatic expressions. Another finding was that, although explicit written correction was the most commonly used strategy in email exchanges, learners preferred explanations with examples. In addition to previously established gains of eTandem learning, such as authentic communication, forging friendship and promoting intercultural awareness, positive responses to competent L1 partners’ error corrections was another major benefit indicated in our data. Our study pinpoints the importance of both pre-project training of participants on error-correction strategies with examples and how to respond to partner feedback in future eTandem projects.
format Article
id doaj-art-02538cbfc11a475faee54b1c4ae96c2c
institution Kabale University
issn 2748-3479
language English
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning
spelling doaj-art-02538cbfc11a475faee54b1c4ae96c2c2025-01-20T11:08:49ZengDe GruyterJournal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning2748-34792021-08-011111014410.1515/jccall-2021-2005Exploring language learning and corrective feedback in an eTandem projectTang Jinlan0Qian Kan1Wang Na2Hu Xiaona3Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, ChinaThe Open University, Milton Keynes, UKBeijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, ChinaMany studies about eTandem and language learning stem from learners in Western institutions of higher education. Unfortunately, there is a lack of research investigating the telecollaboration regarding language development between learners in the East and the West. Against this backdrop, a small-scale, six-week Chinese-English eTandem project focusing on learners’ language learning processes and experiences was undertaken between nine Chinese university students learning English in China and nine British university students learning Chinese in the UK. Multiple datasets were collected from learners’ diaries, synchronous Skype communication recordings, email exchanges, interviews and a post-project survey. This paper reports the main language error types made by Chinese L2 learners of English and error correction strategies provided by eTandem partners of competent L1 English speakers, along with how Chinese participants responded to the corrections. A thorough analysis of the research data indicated three types of linguistic errors in written tasks made by Chinese L2 learners of English: grammatical, lexical and idiomatic expressions. Another finding was that, although explicit written correction was the most commonly used strategy in email exchanges, learners preferred explanations with examples. In addition to previously established gains of eTandem learning, such as authentic communication, forging friendship and promoting intercultural awareness, positive responses to competent L1 partners’ error corrections was another major benefit indicated in our data. Our study pinpoints the importance of both pre-project training of participants on error-correction strategies with examples and how to respond to partner feedback in future eTandem projects.https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2021-2005error correctionerror responseetandem language learningfeedbacktelecollaboration
spellingShingle Tang Jinlan
Qian Kan
Wang Na
Hu Xiaona
Exploring language learning and corrective feedback in an eTandem project
Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning
error correction
error response
etandem language learning
feedback
telecollaboration
title Exploring language learning and corrective feedback in an eTandem project
title_full Exploring language learning and corrective feedback in an eTandem project
title_fullStr Exploring language learning and corrective feedback in an eTandem project
title_full_unstemmed Exploring language learning and corrective feedback in an eTandem project
title_short Exploring language learning and corrective feedback in an eTandem project
title_sort exploring language learning and corrective feedback in an etandem project
topic error correction
error response
etandem language learning
feedback
telecollaboration
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2021-2005
work_keys_str_mv AT tangjinlan exploringlanguagelearningandcorrectivefeedbackinanetandemproject
AT qiankan exploringlanguagelearningandcorrectivefeedbackinanetandemproject
AT wangna exploringlanguagelearningandcorrectivefeedbackinanetandemproject
AT huxiaona exploringlanguagelearningandcorrectivefeedbackinanetandemproject