Effect of New Peripudendal Block (PPB) in the Second Stage of Labour on Perineal Relaxation and on the Reduction of Episiotomy Rate: A Randomized Control Trial

Background and Objectives. We developed a new procedure peripudendal block (PPB) by modifying the traditional pudendal nerve block (PNB). Methods. In a prospective randomized study, we examined the extent to which the PPB we developed changed the rate of episiotomies, injury rates. Results. A total...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Artur Beke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9352540
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832564862955290624
author Artur Beke
author_facet Artur Beke
author_sort Artur Beke
collection DOAJ
description Background and Objectives. We developed a new procedure peripudendal block (PPB) by modifying the traditional pudendal nerve block (PNB). Methods. In a prospective randomized study, we examined the extent to which the PPB we developed changed the rate of episiotomies, injury rates. Results. A total of 333 primiparas and 324 multiparas were included in the study. In the case of primiparas, we used the PPD procedure in 133 cases, while in the case of multiparas, we used it in 103 cases. The rate of episiotomy in primiparas was 89/133 (66.9%) with PPD and 181/200 (90.5%) without PPD p<0.02. In multiparas, the episiotomy rate was 30/103 (29.1%) with PPD and 140/221 (63.3%) without PPD p<0.02. In the case of primiparas, the rate of perineal injury and lesion was 33/133 (24.8%) with PPD, while without PPD it was 12/200 (6.0%). Examining the need for all surgical care (due to episiotomy and/or injury), a total of 103/133 cases of operative surgery were required with PPD (77/4%) while 183/200 cases were required without PPD (91.5%)p<0.02. In the case of multiparas, the rate of perineal injury and lesion was 11/103 (10.7%) with PPD, while without PPD it was 9/221 (4.1%). In the case of multiparas, a total of 41/103 cases required surgical care with PPD (39.8%), while without PPD, 147/221 cases required surgical care (66.5%)p<0.02. Conclusion. The PPB is simpler, requires less medication, can be easily mastered, and perineal relaxation can also be observed, reducing the need for an episiotomy.
format Article
id doaj-art-022e0b5c6cb941e18498960739617a81
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9597
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Obstetrics and Gynecology International
spelling doaj-art-022e0b5c6cb941e18498960739617a812025-02-03T01:09:53ZengWileyObstetrics and Gynecology International1687-95972022-01-01202210.1155/2022/9352540Effect of New Peripudendal Block (PPB) in the Second Stage of Labour on Perineal Relaxation and on the Reduction of Episiotomy Rate: A Randomized Control TrialArtur Beke0Semmelweis UniversityBackground and Objectives. We developed a new procedure peripudendal block (PPB) by modifying the traditional pudendal nerve block (PNB). Methods. In a prospective randomized study, we examined the extent to which the PPB we developed changed the rate of episiotomies, injury rates. Results. A total of 333 primiparas and 324 multiparas were included in the study. In the case of primiparas, we used the PPD procedure in 133 cases, while in the case of multiparas, we used it in 103 cases. The rate of episiotomy in primiparas was 89/133 (66.9%) with PPD and 181/200 (90.5%) without PPD p<0.02. In multiparas, the episiotomy rate was 30/103 (29.1%) with PPD and 140/221 (63.3%) without PPD p<0.02. In the case of primiparas, the rate of perineal injury and lesion was 33/133 (24.8%) with PPD, while without PPD it was 12/200 (6.0%). Examining the need for all surgical care (due to episiotomy and/or injury), a total of 103/133 cases of operative surgery were required with PPD (77/4%) while 183/200 cases were required without PPD (91.5%)p<0.02. In the case of multiparas, the rate of perineal injury and lesion was 11/103 (10.7%) with PPD, while without PPD it was 9/221 (4.1%). In the case of multiparas, a total of 41/103 cases required surgical care with PPD (39.8%), while without PPD, 147/221 cases required surgical care (66.5%)p<0.02. Conclusion. The PPB is simpler, requires less medication, can be easily mastered, and perineal relaxation can also be observed, reducing the need for an episiotomy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9352540
spellingShingle Artur Beke
Effect of New Peripudendal Block (PPB) in the Second Stage of Labour on Perineal Relaxation and on the Reduction of Episiotomy Rate: A Randomized Control Trial
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
title Effect of New Peripudendal Block (PPB) in the Second Stage of Labour on Perineal Relaxation and on the Reduction of Episiotomy Rate: A Randomized Control Trial
title_full Effect of New Peripudendal Block (PPB) in the Second Stage of Labour on Perineal Relaxation and on the Reduction of Episiotomy Rate: A Randomized Control Trial
title_fullStr Effect of New Peripudendal Block (PPB) in the Second Stage of Labour on Perineal Relaxation and on the Reduction of Episiotomy Rate: A Randomized Control Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of New Peripudendal Block (PPB) in the Second Stage of Labour on Perineal Relaxation and on the Reduction of Episiotomy Rate: A Randomized Control Trial
title_short Effect of New Peripudendal Block (PPB) in the Second Stage of Labour on Perineal Relaxation and on the Reduction of Episiotomy Rate: A Randomized Control Trial
title_sort effect of new peripudendal block ppb in the second stage of labour on perineal relaxation and on the reduction of episiotomy rate a randomized control trial
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9352540
work_keys_str_mv AT arturbeke effectofnewperipudendalblockppbinthesecondstageoflabouronperinealrelaxationandonthereductionofepisiotomyratearandomizedcontroltrial