A Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of 4% Articaine versus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery under Supraclavicular Block

Background. Articaine has been used in many dental and ophthalmic outpatient procedures. In the era of ultrasound-guided regional techniques, we searched for short and potent local anesthetic for patients undergoing ambulatory upper limb procedures. However, studies about articaine efficacy in brach...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon H. Armanious, Gamal A. Abdelhameed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2194873
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550462463672320
author Simon H. Armanious
Gamal A. Abdelhameed
author_facet Simon H. Armanious
Gamal A. Abdelhameed
author_sort Simon H. Armanious
collection DOAJ
description Background. Articaine has been used in many dental and ophthalmic outpatient procedures. In the era of ultrasound-guided regional techniques, we searched for short and potent local anesthetic for patients undergoing ambulatory upper limb procedures. However, studies about articaine efficacy in brachial plexus block are limited. In this study, we compared its safety and efficacy against bupivacaine as a commonly used anesthetic agent for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods. This randomized prospective study was performed at Ain Shams University Hospital from January to March 2020. A total of 117 patients aged 20 to 60 years, with the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: in group A, patients received 30 ml articaine 2%, and in group B, patients received 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%. We measured motor and sensory block duration as a primary outcome. Other secondary outcomes such as onset of block, duration of analgesia, patient satisfaction, and time to home discharge readiness were also measured. Results. We analyzed data collected from 97 patients. The motor block duration was significantly shorter in group A (165.73 ± 20.33 min) than in group B (220.27 ± 37.73 min). The onset of motor block was faster in group A (8.73 ± 4.33 min), and the postoperative VAS score was lower in group B. Patients in group A achieved an earlier home discharge of 289.67 ± 2.73 min. Conclusion. Earlier resolution of articaine block makes it more favorable than bupivacaine for ambulatory surgery. This trial is registered with (NCT04189198).
format Article
id doaj-art-00e6a9ed600f476d952261b4db9a303b
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6962
1687-6970
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Anesthesiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-00e6a9ed600f476d952261b4db9a303b2025-02-03T06:06:33ZengWileyAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702020-01-01202010.1155/2020/21948732194873A Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of 4% Articaine versus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery under Supraclavicular BlockSimon H. Armanious0Gamal A. Abdelhameed1Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, EgyptAin Shams University, Chairman of Anesthesia Department, Cairo, EgyptBackground. Articaine has been used in many dental and ophthalmic outpatient procedures. In the era of ultrasound-guided regional techniques, we searched for short and potent local anesthetic for patients undergoing ambulatory upper limb procedures. However, studies about articaine efficacy in brachial plexus block are limited. In this study, we compared its safety and efficacy against bupivacaine as a commonly used anesthetic agent for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods. This randomized prospective study was performed at Ain Shams University Hospital from January to March 2020. A total of 117 patients aged 20 to 60 years, with the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: in group A, patients received 30 ml articaine 2%, and in group B, patients received 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%. We measured motor and sensory block duration as a primary outcome. Other secondary outcomes such as onset of block, duration of analgesia, patient satisfaction, and time to home discharge readiness were also measured. Results. We analyzed data collected from 97 patients. The motor block duration was significantly shorter in group A (165.73 ± 20.33 min) than in group B (220.27 ± 37.73 min). The onset of motor block was faster in group A (8.73 ± 4.33 min), and the postoperative VAS score was lower in group B. Patients in group A achieved an earlier home discharge of 289.67 ± 2.73 min. Conclusion. Earlier resolution of articaine block makes it more favorable than bupivacaine for ambulatory surgery. This trial is registered with (NCT04189198).http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2194873
spellingShingle Simon H. Armanious
Gamal A. Abdelhameed
A Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of 4% Articaine versus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery under Supraclavicular Block
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
title A Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of 4% Articaine versus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery under Supraclavicular Block
title_full A Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of 4% Articaine versus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery under Supraclavicular Block
title_fullStr A Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of 4% Articaine versus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery under Supraclavicular Block
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of 4% Articaine versus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery under Supraclavicular Block
title_short A Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of 4% Articaine versus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery under Supraclavicular Block
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparison of 4 articaine versus 0 5 bupivacaine for ambulatory orthopedic surgery under supraclavicular block
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2194873
work_keys_str_mv AT simonharmanious arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparisonof4articaineversus05bupivacaineforambulatoryorthopedicsurgeryundersupraclavicularblock
AT gamalaabdelhameed arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparisonof4articaineversus05bupivacaineforambulatoryorthopedicsurgeryundersupraclavicularblock
AT simonharmanious randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparisonof4articaineversus05bupivacaineforambulatoryorthopedicsurgeryundersupraclavicularblock
AT gamalaabdelhameed randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparisonof4articaineversus05bupivacaineforambulatoryorthopedicsurgeryundersupraclavicularblock