Subtalar joint pronation: Which is the real concern-presence or severity? A cross-sectional study

The study aims to compare static and dynamic postural stability, navicular drop, dorsiflexion range of motion, and jumping performance of individuals with neutral, prone, and hyperprone foot postures. Forty-eight participants between the ages of 18 and 40, were categorized into neutral (n=16), prone...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yahya Süleyman Mollaibrahimoğlu, Nurefşan Kaygas, Özlem Feyzioğlu, Pelin Pişirici
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Turkish Journal of Kinesiology 2024-09-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Kinesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4152979
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589516398919680
author Yahya Süleyman Mollaibrahimoğlu
Nurefşan Kaygas
Özlem Feyzioğlu
Pelin Pişirici
author_facet Yahya Süleyman Mollaibrahimoğlu
Nurefşan Kaygas
Özlem Feyzioğlu
Pelin Pişirici
author_sort Yahya Süleyman Mollaibrahimoğlu
collection DOAJ
description The study aims to compare static and dynamic postural stability, navicular drop, dorsiflexion range of motion, and jumping performance of individuals with neutral, prone, and hyperprone foot postures. Forty-eight participants between the ages of 18 and 40, were categorized into neutral (n=16), prone (n=16), and hyperprone (n=16) according to foot posture index (FPI). Static and dynamic postural control evaluations (with the Biodex Balance System SD), navicular drop test (NDT) weight-bearing lunge test, countermovement jump test without arm swing, and drop vertical jump tests have been completed. In the results, the average age of participants in the NG, PG, and HPG are 22.31 ± 2.75, 23.87± 3.72, and 22.37 ± 1.28 years and BMI are 22.6 ± 3, 23.4 ± 3.8, and 21.4 ± 2.24 (kg/m²), respectively. The demographic data of the participants showed a homogeneous distribution. There were no significant differences in none of the outcomes except the NDT. Navicular drop amount is positively correlated by the subtalar joint pronation. An increase in subtalar joint pronation does not have a significant effect on static and dynamic stability, jump performance, or dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy individuals.
format Article
id doaj-art-00e3647fe07d4b5ab1e26aa82e65674f
institution Kabale University
issn 2459-0134
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Turkish Journal of Kinesiology
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Kinesiology
spelling doaj-art-00e3647fe07d4b5ab1e26aa82e65674f2025-01-24T12:40:02ZengTurkish Journal of KinesiologyTurkish Journal of Kinesiology2459-01342024-09-0110316917710.31459/turkjkin.1535023649Subtalar joint pronation: Which is the real concern-presence or severity? A cross-sectional studyYahya Süleyman Mollaibrahimoğlu0https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3256-7760Nurefşan Kaygas1https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3670-4696Özlem Feyzioğlu2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7479-4128Pelin Pişirici3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1337-4194BAHCESEHIR UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCESBAHCESEHIR UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCESACIBADEM UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCESBAHCESEHIR UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCESThe study aims to compare static and dynamic postural stability, navicular drop, dorsiflexion range of motion, and jumping performance of individuals with neutral, prone, and hyperprone foot postures. Forty-eight participants between the ages of 18 and 40, were categorized into neutral (n=16), prone (n=16), and hyperprone (n=16) according to foot posture index (FPI). Static and dynamic postural control evaluations (with the Biodex Balance System SD), navicular drop test (NDT) weight-bearing lunge test, countermovement jump test without arm swing, and drop vertical jump tests have been completed. In the results, the average age of participants in the NG, PG, and HPG are 22.31 ± 2.75, 23.87± 3.72, and 22.37 ± 1.28 years and BMI are 22.6 ± 3, 23.4 ± 3.8, and 21.4 ± 2.24 (kg/m²), respectively. The demographic data of the participants showed a homogeneous distribution. There were no significant differences in none of the outcomes except the NDT. Navicular drop amount is positively correlated by the subtalar joint pronation. An increase in subtalar joint pronation does not have a significant effect on static and dynamic stability, jump performance, or dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy individuals.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4152979dorsiflexionflat feetjumping performancenavicular droppostural control.
spellingShingle Yahya Süleyman Mollaibrahimoğlu
Nurefşan Kaygas
Özlem Feyzioğlu
Pelin Pişirici
Subtalar joint pronation: Which is the real concern-presence or severity? A cross-sectional study
Turkish Journal of Kinesiology
dorsiflexion
flat feet
jumping performance
navicular drop
postural control.
title Subtalar joint pronation: Which is the real concern-presence or severity? A cross-sectional study
title_full Subtalar joint pronation: Which is the real concern-presence or severity? A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Subtalar joint pronation: Which is the real concern-presence or severity? A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Subtalar joint pronation: Which is the real concern-presence or severity? A cross-sectional study
title_short Subtalar joint pronation: Which is the real concern-presence or severity? A cross-sectional study
title_sort subtalar joint pronation which is the real concern presence or severity a cross sectional study
topic dorsiflexion
flat feet
jumping performance
navicular drop
postural control.
url https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4152979
work_keys_str_mv AT yahyasuleymanmollaibrahimoglu subtalarjointpronationwhichistherealconcernpresenceorseverityacrosssectionalstudy
AT nurefsankaygas subtalarjointpronationwhichistherealconcernpresenceorseverityacrosssectionalstudy
AT ozlemfeyzioglu subtalarjointpronationwhichistherealconcernpresenceorseverityacrosssectionalstudy
AT pelinpisirici subtalarjointpronationwhichistherealconcernpresenceorseverityacrosssectionalstudy