How do animals weigh conflicting information about reward sources over time? Comparing dynamic averaging models
Abstract Optimal foraging theory suggests that animals make decisions which maximize their food intake per unit time when foraging, but the mechanisms animals use to track the value of behavioral alternatives and choose between them remain unclear. Several models for how animals integrate past exper...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Jack Van Allsburg, Timothy A. Shahan |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Animal Cognition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-024-01840-2 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Research on Optimal Power Generation Scheduling for Reservoir in Multi-Tailed River Channels
by: ZHANG Yonghui, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Comparison of Two Meta-Analysis Methods: Inverse-Variance-Weighted Average and Weighted Sum of Z-Scores
by: Cue Hyunkyu Lee, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
AVERAGE SCORE OF THE UNIFIED STATE EXAMINATION
by: L. M. Nurieva, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
А quantitative estimate of uncertainty of the random scattering of the average clearance and interference in mating
by: N. N. Chigrik
Published: (2022-11-01) -
A Comparison Between the MEWMA and Mahalanobis Distance Control Chart
by: Kawa Rashid
Published: (2021-12-01)