Intercomparison of Leaf Area Index Products Derived from Satellite Data over the Heihe River Basin
The leaf area index (LAI) is a crucial parameter for climate change research, agricultural management, and ecosystem monitoring. Despite extensive use of remote sensing data to estimate the LAI, comprehensive evaluations of product consistency and uncertainty remain limited. This study evaluated the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Remote Sensing |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/7/1233 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The leaf area index (LAI) is a crucial parameter for climate change research, agricultural management, and ecosystem monitoring. Despite extensive use of remote sensing data to estimate the LAI, comprehensive evaluations of product consistency and uncertainty remain limited. This study evaluated the uncertainties of four LAI products—GLASS, MCD15A2H, VNP15A2H, and CLMS—across diverse land cover types in the Heihe River Basin through two triple collocation approaches, innovatively. Each approach, respectively, focused on achieving more precise temporal characteristics and spatial characteristics of product uncertainties. The results indicate that all products generally met the Global Climate Observing System’s precision requirement (±0.5) for most biomes during the growing season. When comparing monthly uncertainties within grid cells, GLASS demonstrates superior performance, particularly in grasslands and croplands, whereas CLMS exhibits a slightly weaker ability to represent the spatial distribution of the LAI, especially in regions with high LAI values. When time series data are used to analyze the seasonal uncertainties of the products, MCD15A2H and VNP15A2H show more pronounced distortions, indicating their limited capability in capturing the temporal dynamics of the LAI. Correlation analyses revealed strong product agreement in regions with a low LAI, but discrepancies increased during the growing season and in heterogeneous land covers like croplands. These findings provide critical insights into the reliability of LAI products, offering a robust reference for validating their performance and ensuring their alignment with user requirements across diverse applications. The study highlights the importance of addressing spatial and temporal variability in uncertainties to improve the practical utility of LAI datasets in ecological and climate-related research. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2072-4292 |