Showing 1 - 20 results of 35 for search 'Douglas G. Altman', query time: 0.03s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals.

    Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. by Allison Hirst, Douglas G Altman

    Published 2012-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Four Proposals to Help Improve the Medical Research Literature.

    Four Proposals to Help Improve the Medical Research Literature. by David Moher, Douglas G Altman

    Published 2015-09-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles.

    Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles. by Peggy Sekula, Susan Mallett, Douglas G Altman, Willi Sauerbrei

    Published 2017-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Key issues in conducting a meta-analysis of gene expression microarray datasets.

    Key issues in conducting a meta-analysis of gene expression microarray datasets. by Adaikalavan Ramasamy, Adrian Mondry, Chris C Holmes, Douglas G Altman

    Published 2008-09-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. by David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman, PRISMA Group

    Published 2009-07-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Assessment of the Incremental Benefit of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) for Interpretation of CT Colonography by Experienced and Inexperienced Readers.

    Assessment of the Incremental Benefit of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) for Interpretation of CT Colonography by Experienced and Inexperienced Readers. by Darren Boone, Susan Mallett, Justine McQuillan, Stuart A Taylor, Douglas G Altman, Steve Halligan

    Published 2015-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: an opinion survey regarding the establishment of a central repository.

    Sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: an opinion survey regarding the establishment of a central repository. by Catrin Tudur Smith, Kerry Dwan, Douglas G Altman, Mike Clarke, Richard Riley, Paula R Williamson

    Published 2014-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Multi-reader multi-case studies using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve as a measure of diagnostic accuracy: systematic review with a focus on quality of data reporting.

    Multi-reader multi-case studies using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve as a measure of diagnostic accuracy: systematic review with a focus on quality of da... by Thaworn Dendumrongsup, Andrew A Plumb, Steve Halligan, Thomas R Fanshawe, Douglas G Altman, Susan Mallett

    Published 2014-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology.

    COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology. by Olaf M Dekkers, Jan P Vandenbroucke, Myriam Cevallos, Andrew G Renehan, Douglas G Altman, Matthias Egger

    Published 2019-02-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.

    Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey. by Sarah L Gorst, Elizabeth Gargon, Mike Clarke, Jane M Blazeby, Douglas G Altman, Paula R Williamson

    Published 2016-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Statistical analysis of individual participant data meta-analyses: a comparison of methods and recommendations for practice.

    Statistical analysis of individual participant data meta-analyses: a comparison of methods and recommendations for practice. by Gavin B Stewart, Douglas G Altman, Lisa M Askie, Lelia Duley, Mark C Simmonds, Lesley A Stewart

    Published 2012-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    THE REVISED CONSORT STATEMENT FOR REPORTING RANDOMIZED TRIALS: EXPLANATION AND ELABORATION (2001) (ENDING)

    THE REVISED CONSORT STATEMENT FOR REPORTING RANDOMIZED TRIALS: EXPLANATION AND ELABORATION (2001) (ENDING) by Douglas G. Altman, Kenneth F. Schulz, David Moher, Matthias Egger, Frank Davidoff, Diana Elbourne, Peter C. Gtzsche, Thomas Lang

    Published 2016-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement.

    Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. by Hugh MacPherson, Douglas G Altman, Richard Hammerschlag, Li Youping, Wu Taixiang, Adrian White, David Moher, STRICTA Revision Group

    Published 2010-06-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations.

    Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations. by Jamie J Kirkham, Katherine Davis, Katherine Davis, Douglas G Altman, Jane M Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Sean Tunis, Paula R Williamson

    Published 2017-11-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    THE REVISED CONSORT STATEMENT FOR REPORTING RANDOMIZED TRIALS: EXPLANATION AND ELABORATION (2001) (PART II)

    THE REVISED CONSORT STATEMENT FOR REPORTING RANDOMIZED TRIALS: EXPLANATION AND ELABORATION (2001) (PART II) by Douglas G. Altman, Kenneth F. Schulz, David Moher, Matthias Egger, Frank Davidoff, Diana Elbourne, Peter C. Getzsche, Thomas Lang, N. Chipigina

    Published 2016-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    THE REVISED CONSORT STATEMENT FOR REPORTING RANDOMIZED TRIALS: EXPLANATION AND ELABORATION (2001)

    THE REVISED CONSORT STATEMENT FOR REPORTING RANDOMIZED TRIALS: EXPLANATION AND ELABORATION (2001) by Douglas G. Altman, Kenneth F. Schulz, David Moher, Matthias Egger, Frank Davidoff, Diana Elbourne, Peter C. G tzsche, Thomas Lang, N. Chipigina

    Published 2016-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    THE REVISED CONSORT STATEMENT FOR REPORTING RANDOMIZED TRIALS: EXPLANATION AND ELABORATION (2001) (CONTINUATION)

    THE REVISED CONSORT STATEMENT FOR REPORTING RANDOMIZED TRIALS: EXPLANATION AND ELABORATION (2001) (CONTINUATION) by Douglas G. Altman, Kenneth F. Schulz, David Moher, Matthias Egger, Frank Davidoff, Diana Elbourne, Peter C. G tzsche, Thomas Lang, N. Chipigina

    Published 2016-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials.

    Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials. by Kerry Dwan, Douglas G Altman, Mike Clarke, Carrol Gamble, Julian P T Higgins, Jonathan A C Sterne, Paula R Williamson, Jamie J Kirkham

    Published 2014-06-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist.

    Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist. by Karel G M Moons, Joris A H de Groot, Walter Bouwmeester, Yvonne Vergouwe, Susan Mallett, Douglas G Altman, Johannes B Reitsma, Gary S Collins

    Published 2014-10-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Reporting and methods in clinical prediction research: a systematic review.

    Reporting and methods in clinical prediction research: a systematic review. by Walter Bouwmeester, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff, Susan Mallett, Mirjam I Geerlings, Yvonne Vergouwe, Ewout W Steyerberg, Douglas G Altman, Karel G M Moons

    Published 2012-01-01
    Get full text
    Article
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: